Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Charlotte O'Dell
Sooper Speshul Ponee Fors
2481
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 03:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
I do not like the idea of paying for each individual liter of paint for every suit i lose. It just sounds...exploitive...furthermore, it would discourage inferior players from spending AURUM on custom skins, as it would cost them more than it would experienced players.
Since it offers to real tactical advantage, a subscription, say $5/month could be paid to paint any piece of gear any color that a player wants.
Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
|
Malkai Inos
Any Given Day
1456
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 03:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
I've proposed something to that effect for Dust a while back
I once wrote:[...] Personal and Corpwide custom suit/vehicle paint schemes. Can be made available in tiers e.g.:
I) Generic colors from limited pallette II) Above with extended pallete and simple patterns (classic camos, fractals etc.) III) All of the above, alternate material shaders (flat/worn, rusted, carbon, goldBlink) and the ability to paint parts individually for "one of a kind" designs (client performance concerns?).
Alliance ads:
I)Alliance Banners in PC/FW war barges during selected timezones (open corp info when interacted with) II) Corp/Alliance description on Merc quarter TV
Making all of those tradeable, consumable items (like PLEX) would allow corp leaders to pay for them through taxes and hopefully alleviate the "who's paying for it?" issue. It keeps those features from being locked behind a solid paywall aswell.
To get to the topic CCP could also bundle these with subs:
"Mercenary" sub nets one 30day booster and tier I personal colors, Some AUR. "Veteran" sub includes one 30day booster+ tier II personal and tier I corp colors, Some AUR "Elite" sub includes tier III customization and banners (+benefits for corpmates? 1day boosters, even?!).
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
380
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 03:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
...............................
Or, you could use the options we already have. A good one is, you know, making it a BPO. Works just like in EVE. |
Malkai Inos
Any Given Day
1456
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 04:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:...............................
Or, you could use the options we already have. A good one is, you know, making it a BPO. Works just like in EVE. It's BPCs in EVE and the "duplicate item with unique typeID" requires manual dev work for every single ship/scheme/logo combo due to them still being hard-coded into said typeID. This is simply not viable if you want to allow any significant degree of user customization (wonder why there's only a handful of popular ships with mostly 1-3 options each?).
The current EVE implementation is obviously a stop-gap solution to assess profitability before building a dynamic implementation and they even said as much their initial dev-blog on the matter.
Good that Legion is a different game so that there's no need to run into this kind of legacy issues.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
Regis Blackbird
DUST University Ivy League
298
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 12:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:I do not like the idea of paying for each individual liter of paint for every suit i lose. It just sounds...exploitive...furthermore, it would discourage inferior players from spending AURUM on custom skins, as it would cost them more than it would experienced players.
Since it offers to real tactical advantage, a subscription, say $5/month could be paid to paint any piece of gear any color that a player wants.
Well, in light of CCP Z's plan to make all drop suites "BPOs" (read: permanent), I don't think we have a problem here
I think we will see more cosmetic AURUM purchases, all geared towards being permanent. CCP Z also stated there will be no more AURUM guns and equipment to reduce skill leap frogging.
But things may change? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |