|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
504
   |
Posted - 2014.06.24 23:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Honestly, that should be all roles. Give them between ADV/PRO number of slots but each tier just increases available CPU/PG. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
507
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 23:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Kallas Hallytyr wrote:Honestly, that should be all roles. Give them between ADV/PRO number of slots but each tier just increases available CPU/PG. I don't know if it would work it all suits, I'd like to see it work like that, but I think it should be tested before giving to everyone(mainly with the Logi and the commando)
Well, it should either be implemented for everyone or no one, though not necessarily immediately. Tested for sure, but every suit should follow the same basic progression (everyone gets increased slot layout, or everyone gets the CPU/PG progression.)
Why should it only be Logi/Commando? |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
507
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 00:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:
@Kallas, I think it could ruin the assault/heavy/scout at lower tiers and possibly make them OP.
The Commando only gets 4 slots anyway, that's why I suggest it be added in.
Based on what, besides intuition, do you feel it would make Assaults/Heavies/Scouts OP but not Logistics/Commandos? Again, if one would be OP/UP, why would that others not be the same? Surely that would be part of the balancing act, making sure each specialisation had the right amount of slots and available fitting? |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
508
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 02:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
But again, why are you assuming we just take X slot layout from all of them: why not take PRO Commando layout, ADV Logi layout, ADV Assault layout, etc?
That's the thing, if you're going to balance one suit around this style of progression, the others following suit is less work, overall, since the trail has been blazed - and all of it is just numbers and balancing them, which is exactly what CCP/Rattati is doing right now. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
523
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 20:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
The idea, as I understand it, is as follows:
1 GalLogi layout
1 GalAslt layout
1 GalSent layout
1 GalScout layout
1 GalCom layout
1 AmLogi...
And so on. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
616
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 16:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote:Kallas Hallytyr wrote:Honestly, that should be all roles. Give them between ADV/PRO number of slots but each tier just increases available CPU/PG. You have got to be brand new to dust. Dude we want our slots. What you are, talkimg about takes away freedom and choice. No. We want our choice. We want our unique slot loadout. We want our ability to choose. We dont want to be CODed.
Not new, and you must be a moron!
What I was saying was that there would be a slot layout unique to each race's role. Each role would have 4 layouts, one for each race, and that would still maintain a lot loadout options, whilst flattening the power curve of STD - PRO by making PG/CPU the determining factor for how much can be fitted.
I don't want to be COD'd, I hate that worthless derivative drivel. That does not mean that all ideas that move away from the current system are COD based. |
|
|
| |
|