|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11124
   |
Posted - 2014.06.24 22:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cause screw your proto tanks until I get my AMARR HAV!
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11124
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 22:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think hardeners need to go back to their old values and have a fitting restriction of one per vehicle.
Screw that noise, modules I wish would go back to pre 1.6 where variety was possible and the ability to fit my HAV for whatever role or tanking type I wanted to was plausible and did not have lame and arbitrary restrictions on it.
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11125
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 22:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ilkazar wrote:True Adamance wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think hardeners need to go back to their old values and have a fitting restriction of one per vehicle. Screw that noise, modules I wish would go back to pre 1.6 where variety was possible and the ability to fit my HAV for whatever role or tanking type I wanted to was plausible and did not have lame and arbitrary restrictions on it. I do agree with you that vehicles were in better shape pre 1.6
They were closer to and more like fitting an EVE ship IMO.
Plenty of Options, progression, flexibility, with unlimited potential.
I mean if I had my old
2 High
4 Lows on an Amarr HAV and pre 1.6 modules back
Amarr HAV hull
Amarr Large Turret
2x Amarr Small Turrets
1x Poly Crystalline 180mm
2x Carapace Hardeners or 2x Adapative Nano Plating
1x Heavy Repairer
2x Heat Sink or
1x Heat Sink 1x Damage Control
BAM AMARR HAV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT IT!
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11125
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 22:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:True Adamance wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think hardeners need to go back to their old values and have a fitting restriction of one per vehicle. Screw that noise, modules I wish would go back to pre 1.6 where variety was possible and the ability to fit my HAV for whatever role or tanking type I wanted to was plausible and did not have lame and arbitrary restrictions on it. I'd take that if we could, but I think that'd need a client side update. So server side, return old hardeners and restrict them to one per vehicle.
Restricting things is never the solution.
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11126
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 23:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think the 20, 22, 25 % Progression was fine with the player deciding how many active to fit vs passive armour resistance modules.
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
|
|
| |
|