|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11238
   |
Posted - 2014.06.26 21:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Atiim wrote:edguy 111 wrote:
lol heavy dont cost 300k
Is this supposed to be a comparison to HAVs? If so, then the player using the Sentinel is far more likely to die (averaging about 2-4 deaths), than the player using an HAV (averaging 0-1 deaths). With that in mind, the end cost of the Sentinel can range from about 3-525k, while the HAV's end cost will range from 0-300k. So in a way, your correct. The Sentinel is higher than 300k.
I just have to think that with blaster dispersion, reduced reps and resistances..... if you are a bricked heavy with a Forge and you are dying to an HAV then you seriously suck.
If Infantry is killing you...... thats not that HAVers problem nor was it caused by them. Likely you will still die in combat fits as you do trying to hang back and pick of tanks.
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11238
|
Posted - 2014.06.26 22:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:edguy 111 wrote:
the problem is, it not fair for the tanker if i can solo him
Yes, it's not fair to the guy that's immune to roughly 75% of the base weapons in the game.
If it wasn't what would the point of a Tank or any vehicle for that matter be in this game?
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11241
|
Posted - 2014.06.26 22:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:True Adamance wrote:Thumb Green wrote:edguy 111 wrote:
the problem is, it not fair for the tanker if i can solo him
Yes, it's not fair to the guy that's immune to roughly 75% of the base weapons in the game. If it wasn't what would the point of a Tank or any vehicle for that matter be in this game? The point of a tank or any vehicles is to be immune to that 75% of weapons but to be vulnerable against that 25% of weapons (most of which are vehicles weapons themselves) in the game specifically designed to destroy it. There is nothing unfair about AV being able to solo a tank.
Never said there was....just wondered why you were citing small arms immunity as though it were unfair.
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11243
|
Posted - 2014.06.26 22:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sounds great to me!
" Those men died loving duty more than they feared death..... they died well."
-Templar Ouryon after Iesa III
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
11315
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 03:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:
the tankers all told you it would happen again.
Except "it" didn't happen again, as all HAVs (and other vehicles) are still completely viable. Arguably more so, due to the 80GJ Railgun and Damage Amplifier nerfs.
Yeah true....but they aren't fun to drive.....
" We need to reclaim their fates and envelop them in ours. And we need to love them, no matter how much it hurts."
|
|
|
| |
|