|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Rainbow Affect
The Rainbow Effect Dirt Nap Squad.
20
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 21:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
So many very small changes, yet such a vastly superior game.
I am very delighted that I now have come full circle, my favored beta fitting of shield tanked scout suit with TAC AR is now viable (at least for pub games) and just as much fun as I remembered it to be. Without it being any sort of OP IMO.
We can only speculate if its merely a case of previous incompetence or simply a way to enforce players to skill other racial guns or the next new shiny for more booster sale. Did they ever intend for it to be balanced at all? (I can't really remember the game ever being as balanced as it is right now, though there still are some small matters to adress.)
In any case, you're definately making the game a lot better just by tweaking stuff, where were you before release man? You could have saved a lot of players from leaving this game if you'd been in charge since early beta....
An odd compliment perhaps, but a compliment non the less....
Its just too bad the game finally is approaching "getting gud" after it in effect is dead... |
The Rainbow Affect
The Rainbow Effect Dirt Nap Squad.
20
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 21:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Well its certainly not the racial gun thing.
I've only ever used Amarr weaponry, and only ever will.
Well thats your loss for just experienceing a fraction of the game's playstyles/toys... |
The Rainbow Affect
The Rainbow Effect Dirt Nap Squad.
20
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 21:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:The Rainbow Affect wrote:True Adamance wrote:Well its certainly not the racial gun thing.
I've only ever used Amarr weaponry, and only ever will. Well thats your loss for just experienceing a fraction of the game's playstyles/toys... I know what this game has to offer, more so than most, I however chose to be more invested in the game however. It's my Alliance's ethos not to eschew all forms of inferior technology in favour of the holy weapons of God. https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/PIE_Inc._(Player_corporation)
Nerds.... |
The Rainbow Affect
The Rainbow Effect Dirt Nap Squad.
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 00:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:You're ignorant. You know, before CCP Rattati, there were others who were very much involved and produced results like Rattati. Logibro, Sabrewing, Wolf, and many others have visited these forums and provided results from feedback.
Simply what happened, after FF, CCP Rattati became the PR guy.
Again, not trying to take anything away from CCP Rattati because he has done a great job, but to dismiss others who were here before him doing the same thing is quite absurd.
For the record, too. If you were here since beta, then you would know that it was the community doing that got the TAC AR nerf. The ARs period were nerfed because of the short sighted community.
"produced results like Rattati" - LOL indeed.
They piled on more content and always introduced new bugs and new FOTM OP stuff one way or another, build after build, While breaking some stuff so badly so that they more or less ceased to be used at all.
Now we're talking about straight up improvements to the game rather than merely changing the game.
Has "he broken anything" yet? As far as I can tell its simply just gotten better, which can't be said about any of the previous builds, including and especially concerning the launch itself.... |
The Rainbow Affect
The Rainbow Effect Dirt Nap Squad.
47
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 09:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:Cat Merc wrote:At least your favorite fitting was viable once upon a time. Mine wasn't viable ever until now. (Regenerative, Speedy Gal Assault with close range weaponry) and even then its not quite there yet
You didn't have Allotek hives before when???
3 basic armor plates, 1 proto repper and a set of these wonderful hives?
I fail to see the problem.... I mean, when an Ammar Assault with its slow movement could do it fairly well I fail to see why a Gallente Asault couldn't, or indeed; can't. |
|
|
|