DUST Search - So all the i win button tankers have now moved to skirm and dom.

All Channels

General Discussions

So all the i win button tankers have now moved to skirm and dom.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Scheneighnay McBob Cult of Gasai 5348	Posted - 2014.06.20 18:42:00 - [1] - Quote Difference is, tanks don't necessarily win the battle for you in skirmish and domination. I've had several instances where the team with a ton of HAVs lost because they didn't have a strong infantry presence to hack. pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
Scheneighnay McBob Cult of Gasai 5352	Posted - 2014.06.21 16:26:00 - [2] - Quote Summ Dude wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Difference is, tanks don't necessarily win the battle for you in skirmish and domination. I've had several instances where the team with a ton of HAVs lost because they didn't have a strong infantry presence to hack. That's a fair point. Of course, it's still not really a solution to the problem. And regardless, a match where half of one team is sitting in tanks and doing nothing to actually help win is going to be less engaging for both sides. This isn't call of duty, a little bit of rope-a-dope doesn't hurt. pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
Scheneighnay McBob Cult of Gasai 5353	Posted - 2014.06.21 23:15:00 - [3] - Quote Summ Dude wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Summ Dude wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Difference is, tanks don't necessarily win the battle for you in skirmish and domination. I've had several instances where the team with a ton of HAVs lost because they didn't have a strong infantry presence to hack. That's a fair point. Of course, it's still not really a solution to the problem. And regardless, a match where half of one team is sitting in tanks and doing nothing to actually help win is going to be less engaging for both sides. This isn't call of duty, a little bit of rope-a-dope doesn't hurt. I'm sorry, rope-a-dope? I don't play CoD, for the record. Basically, rope-a-dope is any tactic that plays on the impatience of the enemy. A fight that "is less engaging" often results in the defenders running off of the objective to go fight wherever the attackers are. During that time, people like me waltz in and stealth-hack. The CoD reference is because CoD players have absolutely no patience or tactical intelligence (explaining why "camping" is frowned upon) pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.