Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
3748
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 23:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Please re release all removed vehicles and modules.
Re balance them and make them fit better.
I really want my Logi tanked Limbus back :'(
a++ püñ GùòGùò a++püñGive Legion a++ püñ GùòGùò a++püñGive Legion a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñGive Legion plz
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
675
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 23:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
i want my yellow dropship bak |
Vulpes Dolosus
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1646
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 00:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Honestly, most of the mods won't be viable because of the reduced slot layout. Still, I would like a little more variety and interesting fits, as well as a return of passive mods.
|
Cross Atu
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2419
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 00:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quoting myself from a similar thread
Cross Atu wrote:Considering the current, more slimmed down, development resources I find it vastly important that we get as much possible content and utility out the assets already generated for Dust 514.
These other vehicles should most certainly be back in the game. In point of fact restoring their presence would improve the possibility of viable Vehicle vs Infantry balance. It is much harder to balance Proto AV vs STD Vehicles, the degrees are wrong. Right now militia AV is a poor joke while MLT vehicles are are viable and useful simply because there are more degrees within the power curve of AV than of Vehicles. Push MLT AV to be viable in the current meta and the power curve makes Proto AV brokenly OP. The lack of types of vehicle also forces each one into more roles, making balance harder and requires that mods define the power curve very heavily allowing for more "MLT stacking" causing issues with the 'risk v reward' and the value of SP investments.
However with a restored vehicle field there are more 'knobs' to fiddle enabling more fine tuning and more diversity. Content, balance, and game play would all be served by including these vehicles once more (and yes, they would need a balance pass... like the entire AV vs Vehicle situation does already).
0.02 ISK Cross
Cross Atu for CPM1- An emergent candidate
|
Bojo The Mighty
Spaceman Drug Cartel-Uno
3873
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 05:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
I second this motion
I'm not resting in peace but rather wandering as a zombie in vengeance of no good reason
|
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE
A.P.E.X BRUTE FORCE
75
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 05:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Guys CCP Rattati said that he can do client updates!!! but he need to fix the op first, i hope the client side come back
Waiting The Sagaris From Ages.
CCP: SoonTM
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
675
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 05:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote:Guys CCP Rattati said that he can do client updates!!! but he need to fix the op first, i hope the client side come back if this is ture then we need to get sandbox on the agenda for dust 2.0, it is imparitive we geta sandbox built to retain new players and end this round based battle system |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |