|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
10778
   |
Posted - 2014.06.18 22:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Would adding back in the vehicles that were taken out (surya, safaris, logo vehicles, etc.) Require a client side update? Or is the data all still there, but they are simply hidden on the marketplace? An answer either way would be appreciated, I'd like to know if adding them back in is a possibility or not.
Seconded.
"You are weak Ouryon....weakness serves not the Empire. I shall teach you strength."
-Yurius of the Brutor to Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
10778
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 23:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........ That doesn't matter. What matters currently is, are they coming back at all or not? If not, your point is moot, if so, we can then debate how they should be balanced. Meh, if they are even considered being brung back, there should be a actual idea of how to fix them before even deciding if they should come back (for dust anyways). In all honesty, even though I would love them to come back, I don't think there's a need for them, or even things to balance them (Cloaks don't exist for BO and FR DS's, the reverse CRU didn't even work for the BO HAV's, The slot layouts that they had were made for old modules and such and would need adjusting, environments not being suitable for them, etc.).
No need for them? Tanking is the most poorly balanced and broken it has ever been....and worse...its boring as hell and unrewarding.
"You are weak Ouryon....weakness serves not the Empire. I shall teach you strength."
-Yurius of the Brutor to Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
10782
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 23:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:True Adamance wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........ That doesn't matter. What matters currently is, are they coming back at all or not? If not, your point is moot, if so, we can then debate how they should be balanced. Meh, if they are even considered being brung back, there should be a actual idea of how to fix them before even deciding if they should come back (for dust anyways). In all honesty, even though I would love them to come back, I don't think there's a need for them, or even things to balance them (Cloaks don't exist for BO and FR DS's, the reverse CRU didn't even work for the BO HAV's, The slot layouts that they had were made for old modules and such and would need adjusting, environments not being suitable for them, etc.). No need for them? Tanking is the most poorly balanced and broken it has ever been....and worse...its boring as hell and unrewarding. Yet you think it's a good idea to add more stuff............. kk
Variation brah. Frankly I could give two ***** about Cal and Gal HAV, I just want my Goddamn Amarr HAV!
"You are weak Ouryon....weakness serves not the Empire. I shall teach you strength."
-Yurius of the Brutor to Ouryon
|
|
|
| |
|