DUST Search - Rattati, a question

True Adamance wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Alena Ventrallis wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........

That doesn't matter. What matters currently is, are they coming back at all or not? If not, your point is moot, if so, we can then debate how they should be balanced.

Meh, if they are even considered being brung back, there should be a actual idea of how to fix them before even deciding if they should come back (for dust anyways). In all honesty, even though I would love them to come back, I don't think there's a need for them, or even things to balance them (Cloaks don't exist for BO and FR DS's, the reverse CRU didn't even work for the BO HAV's, The slot layouts that they had were made for old modules and such and would need adjusting, environments not being suitable for them, etc.).

No need for them? Tanking is the most poorly balanced and broken it has ever been....and worse...its boring as hell and unrewarding.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Godin Thekiller The Corporate Raiders 2630	Posted - 2014.06.18 22:46:00 - [1] - Quote I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........ click me Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller The Corporate Raiders 2631	Posted - 2014.06.18 23:18:00 - [2] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........ That doesn't matter. What matters currently is, are they coming back at all or not? If not, your point is moot, if so, we can then debate how they should be balanced. Meh, if they are even considered being brung back, there should be a actual idea of how to fix them before even deciding if they should come back (for dust anyways). In all honesty, even though I would love them to come back, I don't think there's a need for them, or even things to balance them (Cloaks don't exist for BO and FR DS's, the reverse CRU didn't even work for the BO HAV's, The slot layouts that they had were made for old modules and such and would need adjusting, environments not being suitable for them, etc.). click me Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller The Corporate Raiders 2631	Posted - 2014.06.18 23:30:00 - [3] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd like to point out that if they do bring back the T II vehicles, they still need to fix them first........ That doesn't matter. What matters currently is, are they coming back at all or not? If not, your point is moot, if so, we can then debate how they should be balanced. Meh, if they are even considered being brung back, there should be a actual idea of how to fix them before even deciding if they should come back (for dust anyways). In all honesty, even though I would love them to come back, I don't think there's a need for them, or even things to balance them (Cloaks don't exist for BO and FR DS's, the reverse CRU didn't even work for the BO HAV's, The slot layouts that they had were made for old modules and such and would need adjusting, environments not being suitable for them, etc.). No need for them? Tanking is the most poorly balanced and broken it has ever been....and worse...its boring as hell and unrewarding. Yet you think it's a good idea to add more stuff............. kk click me Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller The Corporate Raiders 2633	Posted - 2014.06.19 00:40:00 - [4] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Variation brah. Frankly I could give two ***** about Cal and Gal HAV, I just want my Goddamn Amarr HAV! 1: More variation of going pew pew at infantry and vehicles, or being a throwaway taxi. 2: That's an entirely different issue. Also, I doubt you'll see them any time soon. click me Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-