|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
2422
   |
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's quite clear IWS is now avoiding the question.
Having opinions on how you think CPM1 might improve over CPM0 is a valid question.
Markdown:
|
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
2424
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 20:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:It's quite clear IWS is now avoiding the question.
Having opinions on how you think CPM1 might improve over CPM0 is a valid question. Hello; I would like to point you to all of the Pryex's posts and videos on why he should not deserve a straight answer. If I had to analogous him with a news organization is that he's the Fox News of Dust 514 or just as bad MSNBC (channel) If he want's an idiotic answer from me he is going to have to present a nearly compromising question on his end. Pyrex knows that he is somewhat of a celebrity and his ego gets in the way of morals. He has purposely used misinformation and mass media to get information to which after getting it he keeps to himself instead of sharing it at times. His brand of riling up the people he is tormenting seems to have no purpose; it's not like arguing against Dust 514's biggest critics to which they have points and can be reasoned with. Also Preyx has a bitter EVE vet status which makes it a bit more difficult to work with at times as he is still butt sore from Eve online's CSM and years of his own misinformation is going to take some time to break and rebuild proper informed conclusions instead of his wild imaginations.
This post is part and parcel of why I have misgivings about you IWS.
Instead of answering the question, you justify why you are treating a member of the community in an unseemly manner. I know Pyrex has a reputation for tin-foil and poor intentions. Whether this reputation is true is not the point.
I think it's important you meet people of his nature with the same respect you would have for anyone else, until he devolves the conversation into the realm where his intentions and nefariousness becomes quite clear and damages his credibility.
He may well be the dust equivalent of the antichrist for all I care, until his questions are proven to be subversive and illegitimate I think your obligation is to try and respectfully answer his question.
Markdown:
|
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
2426
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
Preyx is an absolute dangerous person to give answers to and he's already proven his tinfoiler with the election so far with other candidates. It's his reputation and his level of respect needs to be raised before I match it; he needs to understands there are wider consequences (and have been already) to his shenanigans.
Also what part of my answer is not answering; I don't predict things in without the knowledge of education going behind it. I have stated it again and again; I am no wizard I have no idea what next month looks like; if ccp continues to screw up fine; if ccp does better fine; if CPM 1 somehow destroys the relationship cpm 0 set fine. Which ever outcome it is I for one one will it have no wizardly idea what is going to happen. There are no guarantees on the three sides that any side will or will not improve. If you want to see a candidate that refuses to answer questions head on over to judge's thread; that there is a clear cut example of dodging. It is stupid to make an answer to which translates into a promise in this case if I have no guarantee I or anyone else for that manner can make the result happen.
The truly absolute best answer this trap of a question is to see for ourselves and hope the cpm 1 elect sticks ccp to it. With voter weight into the candidates the responsibility to improve relationships between cpm ccp and community.
If you have a problem with my answer you need to sit down and analyze the question and conclude your own answers; and I hope you have the logic and foresight on how unfair the question is.
I'm disappointed you cannot see your own bias playing here.
No one is asking you to be a wizard.
Here I'll even give an answer hypothetically:
"I would like the CPM1 to have have more frequent accountability to the community"
or
"I would like to be able to be responsible for a weekly report of our activities and impressions from the players"
Of course accounting for any NDA material.
I get you don't want to be snared in a trap, but please realize you're falling in a much more worrisome one by choosing to continue to answer in this way.
The only thing he might be exploiting here, if the fact that you are painting a poor portrait of yourself by choosing to reply in the manner you are choosing.
Markdown:
|
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
2427
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
If you had read the response you quoted it clearly states accountability to the community.
You could also petition for ways in which the community might suggest you might be more accountable to them, however I think the point has been made sufficiently.
I was using hypotheticals, but I think you seem very unwilling even to fathom how CPM1 could be better than CPM0. I don't think its a dangerous exercise, actually I think it would prove a lot that you can suggest CPM0 could have improved.
If you simply don't want to answer the questions, that's fine.
I think you have quite a lot to offer, I just continually unnerved with the way you sometimes approach others.
Markdown:
|
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit
2432
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 19:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:I believe CPM1 can improve upon CPM0 by continuing to build upon any credibility they gained as an institution in Shanghai's eyes.
The more Shanghai takes the CPM seriously, the better.
0.02 isk I can't guarantee this result but if elected but I will do the best to maintain and improve this any and every positive way I can.
I'm extremely relieved at this answer. I still have hesitations, but perhaps you are worthy of one of my votes.
Markdown:
|
|
|
| |
|