|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2352
   |
Posted - 2014.06.28 19:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
lithkul devant wrote:As far as I know the rules of how many people you may vote for have not been announced.
My top two so far are Judge and Cross Atu, Judge has demonstrated his ideas with full length videos and explaining things step by step is why he is on the top of my listing currently. Cross Atu has very good ideas and is respectful, even though many might not know of him.
Thanks for your support. The dev blog has stated that the system will be SVT. This can be hard to get a grip on... so i made a video to explain it, which I will release tomorrow. In the mean time... screenshot.
You get as many votes as their are candidates...sort of... But really, its the top 2 or 3 that matter. I hope my video will make it clear for you.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2352
|
Posted - 2014.06.28 19:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:SVT is a means to ensure your vote does not get wasted; for example if Judge wins by a landslide he will lose all those landslide votes and they're transferred to those voters second choice or so forth choice. Judge will still win and retain most votes regardless.
You can select up to seven transfers to help ensure your vote matters.
I think they will use proportional transfer. So its only the amount of votes I may get above the quota that get transferred, and even then they are made proportional to the sum of my votes. Quota = (voters / (candidates+1)) +1 ................ Its in my video.. I really hope it helps as it can be really confusing. Plus you get many transfers as their are candidates, as this ensures votes don't get lost.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2357
|
Posted - 2014.06.29 19:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
lithkul devant wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Well, I now have two people I know I will vote for. As far as I know the rules of how many people you may vote for have not been announced. I am still waiting to see how many votes I may cast before I actually say I support any single candidate. IWS right now would be a 3rd or 4th tier vote for me personally. While his ideas are good and often times well demonstrated with visuals, he can be far to abrasive and insulting for my tastes. My top two so far are Judge and Cross Atu, Judge has demonstrated his ideas with full length videos and explaining things step by step is why he is on the top of my listing currently. Cross Atu has very good ideas and is respectful, even though many might not know of him.
This video I made might help.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2359
|
Posted - 2014.06.30 10:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:You can put up to 7 people on your ballot.
In most SVT you number every candidate. This is to manage any candidate who may be disqualified and to handle tight elections where no clear winners are expected. I made a video to explain the process.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2365
|
Posted - 2014.06.30 23:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:You can put up to 7 people on your ballot. In most SVT elections you number every candidate. This is to manage any candidate who may be disqualified and to handle tight elections where no clear winners are expected. I made a video to explain the process. It's 7 votes, pay attention.
In a normal SVT you rank every candidate. You are allowed to rank every candidate to ensure in even to most unlikely results your vote gets counted. if CCP chooses not to do this they are breaking from the way SVT is typically run.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2365
|
Posted - 2014.06.30 23:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
I guess CCP has decided to risk a hung election. Their risk to take I suppose.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2367
|
Posted - 2014.07.01 06:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
I said it was usual to allow voters to rank each candidate on a ballot. This is undeniably true. In some countries, like Northern Ireland, your ballot is not counted if you do not number every candidate. In fact some ballots are grouped (this would not work for the dust ballot) to force full listing. One reason for this is to avoid an exhausted ballot.
exhausted ballots are a recognised issue with SVT. It is mentioned on the very wiki page logibro linked to. In an 7/18 election exhaustion is less likely, more so if they use delayed surplus transfer. But my original point was that it is simply usual to allow full ranking.
CCP will choose whichever method they will choose.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templar One
2370
|
Posted - 2014.07.01 09:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kevall Longstride wrote:If memory serves from the CSM election process, the order in which you click on your preferred candidates is how you number them.
Am I wrong?
I am in the dark on this. I just seek clarity so that I can inform anyone who asks of the exact process. CCP I am sure will tell us, but I am already getting questions, and see people talking, including on the forum, about trying to choose the one person to vote for.
If people only vote for one person, or three then their votes may be exhausted. This is not desirable. The actualt votes are scheduled to start in six days. The people who vote, and I am one of those people need to understand the process so that no accusations of unfairness can be levied at the CPM electe.
Judge for CPM 1
Twitter @Judge_EVELegion
|
|
|
| |
|