Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
AmlSeb
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
92
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just give them back as closed threads. It sucks right now that you miss a lot of the feedback for your ideas in the thread
First day veteran, Logi and Commander
Soon a Legionnaire
AmlSeb on Twitter
|
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
2563
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
2120
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill.
Then infantry will complain more.
Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is?
Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1475
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often?
Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn.
Fun > Realism
|
Buwaro Draemon
warravens Final Resolution.
189
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often? Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn.
He is mad because his "I win button" is getting balanced.
"tries to flank" "cloaked scout surprise rapes me" K DEN
|
Guiltless D667
38
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Where did the "remove vehicles from ambush" thread go?
A Strange Game.
|
|
CCP Frame
C C P C C P Alliance
2901
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
We are in the process of creating "The Archive" forum section right now where we will move all locked feedback threads after the feedback period ends. Once that forum section is up, Hotfix threads will be in that section for your viewing pleasure.
CCP Frame
|
|
The Eristic
Dust 90210
466
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn.
You've never seen a Spkr post before, have you?
Reality is the original Rorschach.
Verily! So much for all that.
|
Eruditus 920
Prodigy Ops
157
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
[quote= Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill.
[/quote]
Those that sit in tanks you mean, right?
Your name is appropriate for this topic, wouldn't you agree?
Dominion over others is given not taken. Nothing has power over you but your own fear.
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
1094
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often?
Woah!! Just because you use crutches, dont QQ that players whine over tanks... I saw you stomp nearly every day of 1.7 when 'CCP really favored the Infantry'
Yet as soon as tanks become weaker you log in and post, well if I can't go 30/0 just remove them
^ And don't bother to deny it, thats all your post adds up to.. You should try become one of those tankers that use their brain rather than expecting CCP to hold your hand.. AV kills HAVs working as intended
Tankers QQ ... well you shouldn't have gotten lazy while the going was good, I didn't I ran AV full time during 1.7 now I fear a tank as much as a Sentinel in a knife fight
GG
|
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
14421
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 06:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote: Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn.
He doesn't learn. This is Spkr.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1477
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 06:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote: Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn.
He doesn't learn. This is Spkr.
I know I'm hoping for too much when I expect him to learn to post reasonably. Its my own fault for expecting the best out of people.
Fun > Realism
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
3474
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 08:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often?
I'm not really sure how they're 'severely gimping' tanks, myself.
You say you always run in a squad; run some small turrets. A 20GJ Neutron blaster is pretty easy to fit, iirc, even for me without even proto blasters let alone optimisation, and they'll have like 1200DPS for a total of like 7K damage per overheat.
I'd say that if you can't kill with that you have a serious problem.
CCP Rattati Best Dev
Sorry, Blowout...
|
jaksol JAK darnson
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
Buwaro Draemon wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often? Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn. He is mad because his "I win button" is getting balanced.
you are crazy! its not a i win button!! differnt problem met tnkers then infantry i mean im not kalling your proto suits a i win button
"Sacrifice is a choice you make. Loss is a choice made for you."
|
Winst0n W0lf
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
The Eristic wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:Wait...Are you actually saying that the tanks vs. AV equation is working well right now? Really? If so, prepare to be trolled by the masses until you learn. You've never seen a Spkr post before, have you?
IKR? Are you new here? Because... this is exactly what one expects.
I solve problems. I'm also John Demonsbane.
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
2269
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Necromancy will die.... wait... necromancy can't die.....
PSN: ogamega
I'm not a chef, i'm just a man who likes to cook.
|
THUNDERGROOVE
Fatal Absolution
913
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: He doesn't learn. This is Spkr.
Mostly unable to Lstn
The Amarr scout bonus is like the old Amarr sentinel bonus. No one needed 25% reduction to overheat damage on a heavy;_;
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S.
1676
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often? Some people really should have been born with a built-in mute button.
PSN ID: AlbelNox2569
Cross Atu for CPM1
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S.
1676
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:Nooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Necromancy will die.... wait... necromancy can't die..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry8erzbvQ7E&feature=kp
PSN ID: AlbelNox2569
Cross Atu for CPM1
|
AmlSeb
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
92
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 19:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Thanks for the answers
In the meanwhile: here is the spreadsheet with the updated stats for ARs and co from the deleted thread https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dRIiqkQK4S1_NmisVxjvaBgrEtMcX-D8qz0cR4d_fV4/edit#gid=0
First day veteran
EVE Design Law §1: Either Range or DPS
AmlSeb on Twitter
|
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
2894
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
I might just have to come back, JUST to blow up Spkrs 'gimped tank'
Has it ever occured to you Spkr that the reason the DEVs balance with concerns to infantry is because there are 66% more of us then all you vehicle users COMBINED.
Top that with the fact that this is an FPS not a tank simulator.
Looks like its back to FPS Military Shooter 56
Monkey Mac - Just another pile of discarded ashes on the battlefield!
|
Your Absolut End
Escrow Removal and Acquisition Dirt Nap Squad.
580
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Frame wrote:We are in the process of creating "The Archive" forum section right now where we will move all locked feedback threads after the feedback period ends. Once that forum section is up, Hotfix threads will be in that section for your viewing pleasure.
So when will you move Dust 514 into the archieves then?
Already in preperation I see ;)
|
Pvt Numnutz
Watchdoge Explosives
1461
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:53:00 -
[23] - Quote
sprk how are tanks getting nerfed into uselessness?
Though in his madness he does have a point, some av do want it easy mode. I always get nervous when they tweak av because dropships are so frail. There are quite a few people who use swarms that don't think and just lock and fire and then come here and complain, wondering why they aren't killing an ads. I hope av gets balanced but I also hope CCP doesn't over do it and put it back to 1.6 levels.
Av players, 1.7-.8 was how vehicle pilots felt about av up until the changes. One proto swarm or forge sitting on a tower locking down the entire map and as soon as you try and do something your hit or shot down. Swarms brought dropships down so easy the team would just switch to swarms and spam it to death in a second then switch back. Let's not go there again. |
Will Driver
Horizons' Edge Proficiency V.
77
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 09:55:00 -
[24] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I will ask for a Storage sub forum with locked threads. I have a better idea for Hotfix Bravo. Since you're going to so severely gimp tanks, why not just remove vehicles altogether? You guys constantly bend towards the will of infantry, while completely ignoring the opinions of those that use vehicles. Just get rid of them. This will be the 3rd major overhaul, and of course it's in response to how completely inept those on the forums are at destroying vehicles. You know what? They still won't be happy after Bravo. Why? Because those that use their brains will remain hard to kill. Then infantry will complain more. Then, will you guys finally realize that the problem lies with infantry? How they want to destroy tanks with the least amount of effort possible, with the lowest tier gear there is? Why do you guys constantly capitulate to them? Is there anybody at CCP that uses vehicles often?
You couldn't be more wrong. To wit, the current state of imbalance in favor of tanks.
GÇ£Creativity is knowing how to hide your sourcesGÇ¥
GÇò Albert Einstein
|
ANON Cerberus
ACME SPECIAL FORCES RISE of LEGION
829
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 10:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:I might just have to come back, JUST to blow up Spkrs 'gimped tank'
Has it ever occured to you Spkr that the reason the DEVs balance with concerns to infantry is because there are 66% more of us then all you vehicle users COMBINED.
Top that with the fact that this is an FPS not a tank simulator.
Please dont say it like that, this game IS meant to involve vehicles just as much as infantry play. This is not call of duty or some crap like that.
However vehicles should be powerful because of squad play, powerful because of the tankers own awareness and positioning, powerful because the tanker knows when to activate and push forwards and when to back off.
It should NOT be powerful because of broken items and modules that make a tank semi invincible. Then IF the tank messes up, he just throws on his speed boost and away he goes at lightning speed.
Tanks REALLY only need minor tweaks to be balanced. Dont expect them to become squishy over night as that is NOT what balance is. They need to be feared, they need to be hard to kill by yourself BUT totally possible to do with tactics and good placement.
Right now you can have 2-3 of you with GOOD AV and the best tank fits just laugh the damage off as they zoom around corners. |
duster 35000
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 10:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
ANON Cerberus wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:I might just have to come back, JUST to blow up Spkrs 'gimped tank'
Has it ever occured to you Spkr that the reason the DEVs balance with concerns to infantry is because there are 66% more of us then all you vehicle users COMBINED.
Top that with the fact that this is an FPS not a tank simulator. Please dont say it like that, this game IS meant to involve vehicles just as much as infantry play. This is not call of duty or some crap like that. However vehicles should be powerful because of squad play, powerful because of the tankers own awareness and positioning, powerful because the tanker knows when to activate and push forwards and when to back off. It should NOT be powerful because of broken items and modules that make a tank semi invincible. Then IF the tank messes up, he just throws on his speed boost and away he goes at lightning speed. Tanks REALLY only need minor tweaks to be balanced. Dont expect them to become squishy over night as that is NOT what balance is. They need to be feared, they need to be hard to kill by yourself BUT totally possible to do with tactics and good placement. Right now you can have 2-3 of you with GOOD AV and the best tank fits just laugh the damage off as they zoom around corners. http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/32294451.jpg
Choo Choo
|
Aoena Rays
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
499
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 02:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
Section is now here https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=1775
Story of your life
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |