|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
The Last of DusT.
General Tso's Alliance
5165
   |
Posted - 2014.06.05 14:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
I guess for now you just have to settle for throwing it at the last possible nanosecond.
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
|
Scheneighnay McBob
The Last of DusT.
General Tso's Alliance
5170
|
Posted - 2014.06.05 16:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Maximos Forcus wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Maximos Forcus wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:
You asked a dumb question and got a dumb answer.
Your stupid assumptions signify that you are not worth discussing anything with.
Again I urge you to stop wasting air.
Peace.
Are you so far up your own ass, you fail to understand people might have different views in life and game, and not share your apparent self-evident interpretation of the world? Are you so pathetic that you need things sugar coated and made easy for you?. Is this how you discuss things?. By throwing out constant assumptions and hypes?. I'm guessing you haven't even left school yet. Oh look, I'm talking your language. No, you're not. You use words in the wrong context. Explain it, and people (like myself) might understand what you are actually trying to say. Let's take your last response. "To sugar coat": MEANING: Making something easier to swallow/sweeten. Typically used to make something harsh or abrasive less so. It DOES NOT mean: Make life easy or simple, which is what I think you meant. "a hype": MEANING: Something that's hot, or receives a lot of attention. It DOES NOT mean: ...whatever you were trying to say there. So when someone, me, asks for clarification, it might not be (just) because they are dense. It might be because you freaking suck at English and people don't understand what you are trying to say. Haha. Again you chuck out more assumptions and approach me like a 90% idiot so why would I even bother discussing anything with you. I'll do you a favour and block you.
How about you answer the question you've been avoiding?
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
|
Scheneighnay McBob
The Last of DusT.
General Tso's Alliance
5170
|
Posted - 2014.06.05 16:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Reign Omega wrote:I know I'm a bit late but no? Hated that in cod also hated last stand, any mechanic that allows you to win after you lose is a no go... Yes I did play cod, sue me. Filthy beggar.  Every game I have ever played where the scrubs can get a free kill after dying has been the most butthurt newbcake rubbish ever. It awards failure and becomes a valid tactic to fail magnificently. We have RE's already. We have the PLC already. We can blatantly cook core locus and tank damage for a free kill although iv only ever used sleek or m1 maximum. It would ruin duels and the moment people start losing is the moment the butthurt brigade whips out their brick tanked scouts, cloaked and grenade spams in the face core locus style. Because each match either winning or losing by imbalanced teams wasn't crap enough already.
This is already an option, dipshit.
They aren't asking for grenades that instantly detonate.
Needless as the strategy is, they're just asking for grenades to kill more than the user when they're overcooked.
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
|
Scheneighnay McBob
The Last of DusT.
General Tso's Alliance
5177
|
Posted - 2014.06.06 15:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote:Reign Omega wrote:I know I'm a bit late but no? Hated that in cod also hated last stand, any mechanic that allows you to win after you lose is a no go... Yes I did play cod, sue me. Filthy beggar. Every game I have ever played where the scrubs can get a free kill after dying has been the most butthurt newbcake rubbish ever. It awards failure and becomes a valid tactic to fail magnificently. We have RE's already. We have the PLC already. We can blatantly cook core locus and tank damage for a free kill although iv only ever used sleek or m1 maximum. It would ruin duels and the moment people start losing is the moment the butthurt brigade whips out their brick tanked scouts, cloaked and grenade spams in the face core locus style. Because each match either winning or losing by imbalanced teams wasn't crap enough already. This is already an option, dipshit. They aren't asking for grenades that instantly detonate. Needless as the strategy is, they're just asking for grenades to kill more than the user when they're overcooked. 1. Read the thread dipsht, I answered it. 2. I was clearly stating the options available, do you even think?. 3. You have just lost all credibility and have joined the 90% crew, enjoy. I forgot 4, here's a tampon lol.
1. I got tired of digging through your ****.
2. No, you were not. You were saying that if the suggestion came through, everyone would start using it as a last resort, which is completely untrue, because you still have to cook a grenade the entire time- where you might as well just throw the damn thing and not die.
3. Statements like this mean nothing. I've been a forum warrior since before you've even heard of Dust.
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
|
Scheneighnay McBob
The Last of DusT.
General Tso's Alliance
5177
|
Posted - 2014.06.06 15:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Essentially, what this thread is suggesting is (pretty much) already possible, yet nobody does is.
So RogueTrooper is having a tantrum over nothing.
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
pé¦pâ+pé¦pâ½pâäpâ¬pâ¦pé¦pâ¼pâ+pâêpü»sñ¬S+ïpéè
|
|
|
| |
|