CEOPyrex CloneA wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:CEOPyrex CloneA wrote:-Snip-
snip*
Hi!
Great reply, i really can sense the passion in your campaign and like that you are quite firm about much of your beliefs. ( i also like that you have an edge, something missing from a few of the candidates) its important to have people there voted in by us, who will continue to represent us and not become CCP focussed once in.
I love the ISD idea, it grates me that we have had that 'special missions' tab for ages and no special campaigns or even many events!!
A question if i may, how would you see this ISD being delivered in Dust 514 - given CCP had quite some issues with corruption in the EVE version of the ISD? what could we do to remove this as a risk?
Was there any corruption in the ISD for Eve Online? Apart from some potential sketchy forum monitoring, I'm not aware of any legitimate scandals involving the ISD though I'd imagine that it'd be fairly difficult given that it's strictly a volunteer based organization that is moderated and overseen by CCP themselves.
As far as how I would see the ISD being delivered in Dust 514, there is a misconception that I'd like to address - there is, in no way, a requirement for a test server for either Dust 514 or Legion in order for ISD to work. The Bug Hunting division of ISD is just a facet of the larger project and I did a lot of work in recording video evidence of bugs on the live servers (although it can be frustrating at times).
Bug Hunting, Lore, New Player Support, Player Events - all of those sort of things already happen in-game but with the empowerment of ISD being directly connected to CCP, it'd be better off. I worked fairly closely with CCP Saberwing when it came to bugs and hot-topic issues, forwarding video links to him via twitter to some much received success. IMO, simply having a private channel with which prominent volunteers are capable of forwarding this sort of thing directly to the developers would be a big help on it's own but it'll only ever be TRULY powerful if they can communicate with one another as well.
To put it simply, nothing would really change other than cutting the middleman (twitter/skype) and giving more opportunities for those volunteers to communicate and work together. Having special access to the forums would be, in my opinion, a very simple way to accomplish an early step toward this sort of thing, but I'm interested in alternatives.