|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
medomai grey
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
772
   |
Posted - 2014.05.23 02:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
There are some of you who are complaining about the removal of the cloak dampening bonus. Concerns over having to use profile dampeners and getting picked up by Caldari scouts or Gallente logistics.
The whole point of removing the cloak profile bonus is to force you to choose what you want to be good at. If you still want to be stealthy, you can do that, but now you have to use up slots. If you want to brick tank, you can still do that, but you'll be easier to find. You can't have it all because balance.
But you'll be picked up by Caldari scouts and Gallente logistics you say. To this I reply balance again. These are counters to stealth. If they invested more and sacrificed more in fitting than you to find you, then tough, they're going to find you.
Medium frame EHP is not medium
|
medomai grey
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
776
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 19:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Tank vs tank is NOT fine.
Please tell me why is it fine that my alt with 0 SP into vehicles can fit a glass cannon Sica and destroy every tank out there regardless of their SP investment? While getting destroyed only sets me back 70k?
Tank vs tank is NOT fine if SP investment doesn't play a role. Proto dropsuits have huge advantages over militia suits, while fully skilled tanks only have marginal benefits, if any at all if you don't consider cooldown times.
Because skill >> SP investment. Proto infantry get killed all the time by mlt gear and I don't see any complaints from infantry. For those that do heavily invest in the vehicle related skill trees receive a substantial advantage over those who did not; I'm an ADS pilot, don't BS me. Tank vs. tank is fine.
This may come off as harsh but HTFU(Harden The **** UP) and stop relying on your gear to carry you.
Medium frame EHP is not medium
|
medomai grey
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
797
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 00:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chuck Nurris DCLXVI wrote:FroO Bg wrote:I believe Assault Dropship's basic price should be reduced to 150K ISK. It's stupid how a proto ADS that costs 500K ISK can be taken out by a Militia Railgun Tank with no skills and that only costs 82K ISK with only two-three shots. The only way a militia rail tank can take out an ADS, is if the pilot is either an idiot, or not paying attention. The ADS accelerates so fast that it can easily be out of harms way so fast that even the second hit is going to be a lucky shot on the tank drivers behalf, and there won't be a third. I've seen this so often that it can't be a coincidence. It's possible to down a python with 2 large rail turret slugs and active damage mods.
The delay between firing a large rail turret is so small, most people can't react to doge the second shot. So long as the tank operator has good aim, they're pretty much guaranteed to hit an unaware ADS twice.
Redline rail tanks are especially annoying on maps were the redline is way too close to the objectives, which is most maps.
Not saying ADS shouldn't be destroyed by mlt gear. I just don't completely agree with your experience on the matter of ADS versus rail tank.
Medium frame EHP is not medium
|
|
|
| |
|