Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mia Romani
Nexus Marines
95
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm still a little unclear on this one.
CCP Praetorian did make mention of 'Sandbox Areas' during his Fanfest presentation, but then went on to describe open-world resource gathering and PVP gameplay. He did briefly mention one day "planting a flag", but beyond that there really wasn't a whole lot on actually being able to make meaningful and persistent changes to the game world.
More recently on the forums these areas have been described as 'Wild PVP' areas, a lot of the discussion here seems to focus more on the shooter elements of this game than the sandbox elements.
Is it still the intention for Project Legion to become a 'sandbox shooter'? If so, what does sandbox mean to CCP? Which parts of the experience are they envisaging will be sandboxy? |
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1457
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
EVE: Legion is more sandboxy than DUST 514 ever was.
I am become Legion, the destroyer of bunnies.
|
Mia Romani
Nexus Marines
96
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
I don't mean to be rude, but I would appreciate it if you could qualify that statement.
I will agree that it looks set to be more open-world, but beyond that I'm still looking for more information. |
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1458
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mia Romani wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but I would appreciate it if you could qualify that statement.
I will agree that it looks set to be more open-world, but beyond that I'm still looking for more information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_game
You were saying?
I am become Legion, the destroyer of bunnies.
|
Mia Romani
Nexus Marines
96
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:Mia Romani wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but I would appreciate it if you could qualify that statement.
I will agree that it looks set to be more open-world, but beyond that I'm still looking for more information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_gameYou were saying?
Here is a direct quote from the article you just linked:
Quote: An "open world" game does not necessarily imply a sandbox. In a true "sandbox", the player has tools to modify the world themselves and create how they play.[5]
If open world and sandbox were the same thing, then that would make World of Warcraft a sandbox game. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad.
2880
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Honestly... the first iteration of legion probably wont have much more than Dust in terms of sandbox game play (Planetary Conquest being the only form of sandbox game play in dust atm). Its the potential for better development down the road that makes it interesting.
Planetary Interaction in EVE would be the most obvious source of potential sandbox gameplay that I can think of. |
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1464
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mia Romani wrote:Ulysses Knapse wrote:Mia Romani wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but I would appreciate it if you could qualify that statement.
I will agree that it looks set to be more open-world, but beyond that I'm still looking for more information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_gameYou were saying? Here is a direct quote from the article you just linked: Quote: An "open world" game does not necessarily imply a sandbox. In a true "sandbox", the player has tools to modify the world themselves and create how they play.[5] If open world and sandbox were the same thing, then that would make World of Warcraft a sandbox game. Are you honestly saying you think EVE: Legion won't be a sandbox?
Dear lord, you're so mistaken I can't do anything but pity you.
I am become Legion, the destroyer of bunnies.
|
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
750
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 17:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:Mia Romani wrote:Ulysses Knapse wrote:Mia Romani wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but I would appreciate it if you could qualify that statement.
I will agree that it looks set to be more open-world, but beyond that I'm still looking for more information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_gameYou were saying? Here is a direct quote from the article you just linked: Quote: An "open world" game does not necessarily imply a sandbox. In a true "sandbox", the player has tools to modify the world themselves and create how they play.[5] If open world and sandbox were the same thing, then that would make World of Warcraft a sandbox game. Are you honestly saying you think EVE: Legion won't be a sandbox? Dear lord, you're so mistaken I can't do anything but pity you.
You dumb or something? |
Akdhar Saif
Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative
493
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 18:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
ZDub 303 wrote:Honestly... the first iteration of legion probably wont have much more than Dust in terms of sandbox game play (Planetary Conquest being the only form of sandbox game play in dust atm). Its the potential for better development down the road that makes it interesting.
Planetary Interaction in EVE would be the most obvious source of potential sandbox gameplay that I can think of.
Agreed, 'planting your flag' will most likely mean placing infrastructure in places that will then be fought over.
I can't really think how else they would make the game more open-ended other then the obvious i.e. player limitless battles. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |