Triple Rep (2x Complex, 1x Enhanced) Madrugars are vulnerable to Large Missile Launcher fitted tanks due to the massive burst damage from missiles with a damage mod; lower buffer due to a lack of either a plate or hardener to absorb damage; and the damage bonus missiles get against armour. The Triple rep Madrugar works by drawing out fights where it's superiour sustained tank can help it keep going under constant moderate damage. But with the Large Missile Turret, there isn't enough time to get repairs going to keep the tank sustained, and thus it blows up. However, if you miss with enough missiles, the Madrugar can easily regain it's armour and then you might have some problems due to your long reload time, especially if you had to expose yourself to get the shot on the Madrugar in the first place.

Does that explain it for you?

Considering how AVers give up a primary to do so, while also having to spend similar amounts of SP as other roles (including the Tanker role); yes we are indeed entitled.

Oh, I see, you're one of the people who use those rep tanks c:

That explains your completely bias disposition

You resorting to trolling must mean that you cannot refute logically, and that I have won.

GG was EZ.

I'm kinda amused at your lack of rebuttal to what I said about using a forge gun. If you use a heavy then I'm going to assume you use a forge gun. Then you and know for a fact you can't kill a repping tank with just your forge gun, like you should be able to, alone.

Someone has a true proto rep tank, a forge gun is pointless as throwing paper airplanes at it. It should not be that way, forge guns are an anti-armor weapon, that use to be primarily for taking down tanks.

So they have infact boned the role of the forge gun with allowing supper rep tanks.

Knight would most likely be mounted which would give advantage to the said peasant with the pitchfork (though in medieval combat that would most likely be a pike or a spear). Knight would also be vulnerable to longbows and crossbows and somewhat hindered due to the weight of the armour (20-25kg iirc) while in Dust HAV's shrug most of the AV away like it was nothing.

People that use rep tanks use blasters. No other Blaster fit can stand up to it.

I have actually been standing beside another person swarming and AV grenading them too, so not just relying on me by myself attacking them.

When you do get them about gone, they hit that little booster and zoom off at a 100 miles an hour like a pansy.

One question I would like you to answer though, why is it every single kid from Dirt nap has the attitude of a 16 year old drama queen on her period?

Please don't swing the nerf bat carelessly. I feel that my missile Gunnlogi is in a good place right now against infantry AV.

Do you have a quote from a developer saying that? If not, then that statement is about as credible as me stating that tankers are emergency roles that aren't supposed to be as good as another AVer.

Oh wait, a DEV just stated that this current V/AV is imbalanced; effectively turning what you said into the ramblings of a drunkard.

Indeed it is.

Why do you think they're adjusting V/AV balance?

Nah, because not a single person on these forums, or in-game has been able to provide a logical reason as to why the current V/AV situation is imbalanced.

You included.

You can state what you desire, and be clear as glass. However, that won't change the fact that your statement/assertion is false. Repeating it over and over again will not change said fact either.

Also, CCP has already stated otherwise; so why do you still attempt to sell your argument as if it was designed to be that way?

Tanks should become a serious threat, we have that.

Tanks need their counter, we don't have that.

AV is a futile attempt at dispatching a vehicle, and the only way to guarantee their death(because isk destruction is the name of the game, always has) is for them to hit a wall or for you to literally deal 5400 alpha damage, which requires the tanker to be completely inept.

AV should be a threat to tanks, much like how a tank is a threat to infantry.

A single AVer should be able to solo a solo tank- it should take on average(assuming both builds are MAXED) 9 volleys from a swarm. A prototype maxed AVer should be able to solo a mlt tanker in 1 clip, and a "mid-spec" character in average of 6,

This leaves the tanker at a disadvantage, while still makin them strong. Please, somebody tell me how 9 volleys is a bad number for equal skill/SP in vehicles is a bad idea? Currently it's 12.

So you would prefer if any person who wishes to bring in a Sica to academy be entitled to NEVER dying?

That's how it is now.

We need balance to exist on all tiers.

Needing either Pro AV or a completely inept tanker AND 3-4 mlt swarms SIMPLY to remove that un-piloted sica sitting idle, is ********.

Give me 1 reason we SHOULDN'T balance mlt-mlt AV/V balance.