|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
12991
   |
Posted - 2014.05.01 21:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
To my knowledge there are only two candidates from DNS running.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Oh, forums
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
12991
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 21:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:To my knowledge there are only two candidates from DNS running. Syveven Reed and Zatara Rought are the only two I know of
I would say that Syeven Reed has about a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Zatara has a chance but it probably depends on just how blinded by DNS hate people are.
Also, I'd like to ask, OP - why do you think that having a candidate from DNS on the CPM would be a terrible thing?
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Oh, forums
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
13001
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 06:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
To those people pulling up random numbers who they have no idea what to do with:
~2000 players in DNS is not an accurate representation of the DUST voting base of DNS. A good chunk of those are EVE pilots. Then we have a very large number of inactive players. And then we have the fact that due to it not actually being a completely unified alliance in agreement on everything people aren't going to be uniting to back a single candidate.
'5000 DUST players' is an absurd misrepresentation of the numbers. There are about 4000-5000 on at peak times each day. That does not equal the number of DUST players that there are. Not everyone can play daily, and not everyone plays at the same times. The actual number is likely to be vastly higher.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Oh, forums
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
13002
|
Posted - 2014.05.02 06:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Atiim wrote:
I understand the mechanics behind Planetary Conquest are not that great, but please refrain from using terms such as exploitation.
That would imply that they've violated a rule/regulation specifically set forth by CCP, and needs DEV moderation (ie, banning).
so you're saying ccp intended for molden heath to be controlled by one alliance who just farms isk out of it and then goes and crushes noobs in pub matches thanks to their infinite isk fountain? no? ok, then it's exploitation....
They designed the mechanics.
It has been shown several times throughout DUST's history that it is possible to attain a huge degree of MH control and CCP have never intervened.
DNS is only the third group to dominate MH.
So are you saying that it is violating rules laid down by CCP for gain? Because that would actually be exploitation, and nobody is doing that.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Oh, forums
|
|
|
| |
|