|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
536
   |
Posted - 2014.05.01 19:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:EVE Valkyrie has it and it seems like if they move one game over, they would consider moving the other as well.  What would it mean other than better graphics? DISCUSS.
Haha why is confirmed in this title? |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
537
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 19:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Toby Flenderson wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:EVE Valkyrie has it and it seems like if they move one game over, they would consider moving the other as well. What would it mean other than better graphics? DISCUSS. Haha why is confirmed in this title? Because there's a question mark at the end of the title.
I understand your question mark means that you're not actually claiming that something is confirmed, but I'm asking why bother using the word confirmed when immediately implying not confirmed?
May as well have made it "blah blah is definitely, without a doubt, as positively confirmed as anything has ever been ?"
Would've attracted more attention probably. |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
537
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 19:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Toby Flenderson wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Toby Flenderson wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:EVE Valkyrie has it and it seems like if they move one game over, they would consider moving the other as well. What would it mean other than better graphics? DISCUSS. Haha why is confirmed in this title? Because there's a question mark at the end of the title. I understand your question mark means that you're not actually claiming that something is confirmed, but I'm asking why bother using the word confirmed when immediately implying not confirmed? May as well have made it "blah blah is definitely, without a doubt, as positively confirmed as anything has ever been ?" Would've attracted more attention probably. Well while it's not confirmed, it's easy for people to assume that Dust will get the same treatment. Or at least that's how I saw it. That's all.
It's called speculation. Just think it's counter productive the way people in the forums speculate when we're all skimming the titles to find the highlight features of fan fest. |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
537
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 23:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Yeah, but that's the main point of the thread. To speculate >.>...I never said it was confirmed. I was asking what others think. Even in the title I added a question mark to make you go..."Will Dust get Unreal 4?" Not "OMG DUST HAS UNREAL 4." The former is considering, the latter is jumping to conclusions. It's a bit of a troll, I'll admit but it doesn't take away from the thread nor does it legitimately mislead anyone.
It doesn't mislead, it's just a waste of time for anyone trying to sift through threads for info. I saw this and thought there was good reason to believe this like a dev vaguely commenting on it. I agree it's a good idea for a thread, it's just a poor choice for a title. It doesn't attract people willing to say more than "troll" as well as something more honest to the point would. I wouldn't make a thread about needing the scout suits with a title "scout nerf confirmed?" because it would just lead to a bunch of people coming in and saying "no proof, troll" and dismissing the thread. Something like "Are scouts too good?" Would attract those who have something to say on the matter. A thread like yours appears more like a PSA rather than a discussion thread. That's all I'm saying.
|
|
|
| |
|