DUST Search - Change somec of Combat Rifles and Submachine Guns stats

DEZKA DIABLO wrote:

Thokk Nightshade wrote:

Rino514 wrote:

I was just wondering why does basic and assault variants of combat rifle does have lesser equipment cost than same tier submachine gun and I think ccp should change combat rifles assault variant rof, equipment costs, damage and clip/ammo sizes to same tier submachine gun.

In my mind this would make more sense because should submachine guns rof by larger than combat rifle but at the same have smaller damage and i don-¦t understand why submachine gun require more fitting cost than combat rifle.

Tell my what you think below

The fitting costs I agree with. Everything else, I'm going to disagree. It is a primary weapon, not a sidearm. It should have a solid ROF, Damage, and clip/ammo size. However, fitting costs, I am in complete agreement with. If we wanted to bump those a little bit (not that it would change much for proto suits), I'd be in favor. Give it a higher PG/CPU at least in line with an SMG of the same tier.

Why would you increase the cr, and not decrease the smg? Compare the AR, Cr and smg for instance and then say knives and RR, then the races they belong too.

Min weapons have low pg caldari have high pg and cost is outrageous for a six kin Cr , plus min suits have horrid pg, my adv gal scout has higher CPU an pg than my adv min assault.

And a proto magsec is almost 20 000 isk cheaper than my ish smg.

If this is a under the radar CR nerf and I'm not buying , sorry bout ur luck but if you wanna nerf it don't play some fake angle just be blunt.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Thokk Nightshade Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 99	Posted - 2014.04.29 22:17:00 - [1] - Quote Rino514 wrote: I was just wondering why does basic and assault variants of combat rifle does have lesser equipment cost than same tier submachine gun and I think ccp should change combat rifles assault variant rof, equipment costs, damage and clip/ammo sizes to same tier submachine gun. In my mind this would make more sense because should submachine guns rof by larger than combat rifle but at the same have smaller damage and i don-¦t understand why submachine gun require more fitting cost than combat rifle. Tell my what you think below The fitting costs I agree with. Everything else, I'm going to disagree. It is a primary weapon, not a sidearm. It should have a solid ROF, Damage, and clip/ammo size. However, fitting costs, I am in complete agreement with. If we wanted to bump those a little bit (not that it would change much for proto suits), I'd be in favor. Give it a higher PG/CPU at least in line with an SMG of the same tier.
Thokk Nightshade Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 103	Posted - 2014.04.29 23:36:00 - [2] - Quote DEZKA DIABLO wrote: Thokk Nightshade wrote: Rino514 wrote: I was just wondering why does basic and assault variants of combat rifle does have lesser equipment cost than same tier submachine gun and I think ccp should change combat rifles assault variant rof, equipment costs, damage and clip/ammo sizes to same tier submachine gun. In my mind this would make more sense because should submachine guns rof by larger than combat rifle but at the same have smaller damage and i don-¦t understand why submachine gun require more fitting cost than combat rifle. Tell my what you think below The fitting costs I agree with. Everything else, I'm going to disagree. It is a primary weapon, not a sidearm. It should have a solid ROF, Damage, and clip/ammo size. However, fitting costs, I am in complete agreement with. If we wanted to bump those a little bit (not that it would change much for proto suits), I'd be in favor. Give it a higher PG/CPU at least in line with an SMG of the same tier. Why would you increase the cr, and not decrease the smg? Compare the AR, Cr and smg for instance and then say knives and RR, then the races they belong too. Min weapons have low pg caldari have high pg and cost is outrageous for a six kin Cr , plus min suits have horrid pg, my adv gal scout has higher CPU an pg than my adv min assault. And a proto magsec is almost 20 000 isk cheaper than my ish smg. If this is a under the radar CR nerf and I'm not buying , sorry bout ur luck but if you wanna nerf it don't play some fake angle just be blunt. I would be O.K. with that as well. If people would rather decrease SMG fittings to bring them in line with the CR, I'd be O.K. with that as well. Just to be clear, I'm not talking ISK cost. I'm talking PG/CPU cost. I'm just agreeing with the OP that an SMG shouldn't have a higher fit cost than a primary weapon (in this case, CR). I specifically stated no change to the ROF, Damage, or clip/ammo size. I'm not calling for a nerf for the CR at all. I personally love my CR and am worried about all the people whining about it and it getting nerfed post Fanfest.