|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
2643
   |
Posted - 2014.04.27 15:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Umm why are you trying to defend against a tank with an installation? They take 3 shots of rail, you can be shot while operating them and there damage is comparitvely lower.
They are just free warpoints, they have very little use on the battlefield besides that.
We need new heavy turrets that have a protected cockpit and an 115-¦ degree elevation range that can actually outtank a HAV, we them need light turrets that can deployed via equipmemt that provide directional cover to the user and has equal survivability to a LAV/Dropship.
Unless your a Computer Scientist don't tell me how Game Mechanics Work.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
2643
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 15:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Umm why are you trying to defend against a tank with an installation? They take 3 shots of rail, you can be shot while operating them and there damage is comparitvely lower.
They are just free warpoints, they have very little use on the battlefield besides that.
We need new heavy turrets that have a protected cockpit and an 115-¦ degree elevation range that can actually outtank a HAV, we them need light turrets that can deployed via equipmemt that provide directional cover to the user and has equal survivability to a LAV/Dropship. They are supposed to be distractions, not killers.**** off.
Distractions? Seriously?
So the stationary heavy turrets which are susceptible to anyone clever enough to find advantagous terrain should be nothing more than a distraction?
So what the hell is their point on the battle field?
Why bother having them at all?
Like Masad said they should be purchasable by units and have more power than their vehicle counterparts on the fact THEY CAN'T BLOODY MOVE.
They should pay a HUGE part in our warfare just like everything else.
I should be suppressing choke points with small blasters, shooting bombers and dropships out the nearby sky with AA turrets and missiles. I should be givimg tanks and MTACs a run for their money with a large rail turret.
A distraction? You mean pointless, useless.
Unless your a Computer Scientist don't tell me how Game Mechanics Work.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
2647
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 20:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:There should be no free turrets on the field to begin with. They should be bought and called in by players. Eventually they will be, but I could see issues with calling them in. They can't exactly get dropped by an RDV, and shooting down at high speed would be both glitchy and potentially abusable. Edit: just got an idea- you see those crane trucks? How about some that we can drive, that can haul turret parts to construct? Could also potentially have other uses in the future.
Light turets are 'constructed' from a nano-hive esque equipment placed by regular infantry.
Heavy Turrets are dropped in like they are now in OMS, a titanfall-esque drop, however the 'dropzone' must be clear before a drop will commence, if someone walks under it, that's their own damn fault, although something like a drop signal wouldn't go amiss.
Unless your a Computer Scientist don't tell me how Game Mechanics Work.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
|
|
|
| |
|