DUST Search - Is there anyway to make dual tanking less efficient?

All Channels

General Discussions

Is there anyway to make dual tanking less efficient?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
zero shocker TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN. 11	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:06:00 - [1] - Quote I want it to be like EVE where the weapon does matter. *but hurt*******
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 12748	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:11:00 - [2] - Quote A solution I've always favoured is making tank mods take up large amounts of PG, and utility mods take up a large amount of CPU instead. That way, you can't stack every slot with tank because you'll run out of PG. You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake. EUrobro
Mossellia Delt Militaires Sans Jeux 1279	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:14:00 - [3] - Quote Putting tanking mods in lows Putting reps, chargers, ect. In highs. Join the Channel - CPM1 Candidates - Get to know who's running. Delt for CPM1
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 7313	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:14:00 - [4] - Quote Fixing the Shield/Armor imbalance to the point where they are equally viable accross, and creating incentives to run something other than an HP module would severely decrease the need & popularity of dual tanking Though people such as Cat Merc, Arkena, and KAGEHOSI have created some threads highlighting the main issues of dual tanking, and some interesting solutions to the problem. Sadly I don't have any links, but try searching for them in the Search Tab. However, may I suggest using a Projectile weapon such as the Sub-Machine Gun or Combat Rifle? It's -5 / +10% damage profile along with the high ROF makes it the to-go weapon against dual tankers. Proposed Mobile CRU Changes -HAND
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 7313	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:15:00 - [5] - Quote Mossellia Delt wrote: Putting tanking mods in lows Putting reps, chargers, ect. In highs. And giving biotics their own slot. Proposed Mobile CRU Changes -HAND
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 13134	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:16:00 - [6] - Quote Make damage mods not suck Oh wait... My Music Videos & Fan Fiction Incubus Pilot, ISK plz
Yan Darn Science For Death 678	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:16:00 - [7] - Quote It does matter doesn't it? Isn't that at least part of the reason CR/RR is so popular? However it'd be nice if: 1: Sheilds and Armor had more balance (especially in terms if fittings). 2: There was something else to use high slots for. Unless you are a scout or sniper/FGer, shields seem the best investment. 2a: Shields and Damage mods sharing the same slots doesn't help. From a design perspective it makes sense for the low buffer/high regen tank to have greater damage potential... The Ghost of Bravo
Tectonic Fusion 1593	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:16:00 - [8] - Quote Atiim wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: Putting tanking mods in lows Putting reps, chargers, ect. In highs. And giving biotics their own slot. No. Let biotics be able to be fitted in all slots. It won't break the game at all. Solo Player Squad status: Locked Ehem...OBVIOUSER troll is OBVIOUSER
Seymor Krelborn L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 2167	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:16:00 - [9] - Quote 6 remotes on the front bumper of an LAV makes tanks in general inefficient. this game makes me sad....
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 7313	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:17:00 - [10] - Quote Tectonic Fusion wrote: No. Let biotics be able to be fitted in all slots. It won't break the game at all. Sounds reasonable. Proposed Mobile CRU Changes -HAND

KING CHECKMATE Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 5241	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:19:00 - [11] - Quote zero shocker wrote: I want it to be like EVE where the weapon does matter. *GTO, this is not EVE. Shield,Dual and Armor tanking should be balanced so that all are equally effective IMO.** Like drones? = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=153604&find=unread
zero shocker TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN. 12	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:23:00 - [12] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: zero shocker wrote: I want it to be like EVE where the weapon does matter. *GTO, this is not EVE. Shield,Dual and Armor tanking should be balanced so that all are equally effective IMO. If it is so i dont see the point of having shield and armor just make a health bar. but hurt********
zero shocker TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN. 12	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:25:00 - [13] - Quote dual tanking for cal/gal is stupid. *but hurt*******
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 13136	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:26:00 - [14] - Quote Seymor Krelborn wrote: 6 remotes on the front bumper of an LAV makes tanks in general inefficient. The point, I'm pretty sure you missed it My Music Videos & Fan Fiction Incubus Pilot, ISK plz
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 5983	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:28:00 - [15] - Quote Role bonus applies towards weapon. Racial suit bonus applies to intended tanking type. Gallente reps are more efficient, Amarr plates are beefier, Caldari shields are thicker, and Minmitar shields have a quicker depletion regeneration recovery. All of these are applied at X% efficiency per level, and not some negligible 2% bonus, either. 5%, at least. Boom. Never forget More tiericide, less tieriphiles.
Tectonic Fusion 1594	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:30:00 - [16] - Quote Atiim wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: No. Let biotics be able to be fitted in all slots. It won't break the game at all. Sounds reasonable. I am unsure if my comment sounded sarcastic or not...either way, if you were to stack a lot of kin cats, the penalty would render it pointless, if you stacked stamina mods, you would just run for a long time and die extremely fast, and if you stack melee mods....well, you would die really fast but insta kill with melee attacks which seems balanced. Solo Player Squad status: Locked Ehem...OBVIOUSER troll is OBVIOUSER
Seymor Krelborn L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 2168	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:31:00 - [17] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Seymor Krelborn wrote: 6 remotes on the front bumper of an LAV makes tanks in general inefficient. The point, I'm pretty sure you missed it I try to stay away from pointy things... this game makes me sad....
Master Smurf Nos Nothi 387	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:52:00 - [18] - Quote I would say the easy way might be turning the penalties up. Shield extenders would cause a delay so long and regen slower that a shield based unit would want to use energizers and regulators. Armor plates would make you so slow that you would be a sitting duck so you would definitely mix and match with either reps or kin cats and you would use damage mods because adding any shields would make your little shields take long to start recharging and would recharge even slower. "Shine bright like a diamond"
Cruor Abominare Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad. 119	Posted - 2014.04.26 23:56:00 - [19] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: A solution I've always favoured is making tank mods take up large amounts of PG, and utility mods take up a large amount of CPU instead. That way, you can't stack every slot with tank because you'll run out of PG. oh look done in one. And its basically the first layer of why you don't dual tank in eve. Unfortunately we still have to wade through all the other stupid on the forums and watch this get overlooked.
Scheneighnay McBob Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 4930	Posted - 2014.04.27 00:30:00 - [20] - Quote They already have penalties- expand on them if nothing else. I'm from the weird side of the internet



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.