DUST Search - Swarm lock on range

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Swarm lock on range

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Heavenly Daughter the Aurum Grinder and Company 395	Posted - 2014.04.22 11:55:00 - [1] - Quote Should be at least equal to the range of the blaster turret of tanks The Organ Grinder & Co. EVE Heavenly Daughter-Merc Records
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 375	Posted - 2014.04.22 12:29:00 - [2] - Quote I'd say 50 meters farther than blaster turrets absolute range.
Heavenly Daughter the Aurum Grinder and Company 395	Posted - 2014.04.22 12:37:00 - [3] - Quote Text Grant wrote: I'd say 50 meters farther than blaster turrets absolute range. lol, would be nice but I opted for minimum equal footing. They have more power,speed,resistance and repair capability that a foot soldier. Therefore they foot soldier should have AT LEAST the capability to lock on the range their blaster can shoot. The Organ Grinder & Co. EVE Heavenly Daughter-Merc Records
Repe Susi Rautaleijona 1239	Posted - 2014.04.22 12:42:00 - [4] - Quote +1 It was nerfed unnecessarily hard. Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. ~ Isaac Asimov
Soraya Xel Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 2087	Posted - 2014.04.22 13:35:00 - [5] - Quote It definitely needs a buff. Blaster turrets are supposedly relatively short range, so I would think swarms should exceed that, being self-propelled projectiles and all. The biggest issue, to me, is lock-on being particularly too short versus dropships. It takes less than a single lock-on for any dropship to go from a standstill to out-of-range. I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 376	Posted - 2014.04.22 13:58:00 - [6] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: It definitely needs a buff. Blaster turrets are supposedly relatively short range, so I would think swarms should exceed that, being self-propelled projectiles and all. The biggest issue, to me, is lock-on being particularly too short versus dropships. It takes less than a single lock-on for any dropship to go from a standstill to out-of-range. Yes, and that means after your first hits, the dropship activates an afterburner and outruns the next 2 volleys of turtle rockets.
Vespasian Andendare Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION 881	Posted - 2014.04.22 14:53:00 - [7] - Quote It actually should be longer, considering that you have to stand in full line-of-sight of the tank in order to get the opportunity to fire. Either that or have the ability to lock behind cover. Next, improve missile speed as you go from STD to ADV to Proto. It's far too easy for tanks to dive 0.5 meter behind cover and block most of the damage. >> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! <<
Heavenly Daughter the Aurum Grinder and Company 400	Posted - 2014.04.22 15:04:00 - [8] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: It definitely needs a buff. Blaster turrets are supposedly relatively short range, so I would think swarms should exceed that, being self-propelled projectiles and all. The biggest issue, to me, is lock-on being particularly too short versus dropships. It takes less than a single lock-on for any dropship to go from a standstill to out-of-range. The swarms do, but the launchers is the issue. Just it's lock on range needs to be increased to match or a little more. The Organ Grinder & Co. EVE Heavenly Daughter-Merc Records
Heavenly Daughter the Aurum Grinder and Company 400	Posted - 2014.04.22 15:05:00 - [9] - Quote Text Grant wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: It definitely needs a buff. Blaster turrets are supposedly relatively short range, so I would think swarms should exceed that, being self-propelled projectiles and all. The biggest issue, to me, is lock-on being particularly too short versus dropships. It takes less than a single lock-on for any dropship to go from a standstill to out-of-range. Yes, and that means after your first hits, the dropship activates an afterburner and outruns the next 2 volleys of turtle rockets. Yes, had a game just now and 2 of us using swarms couldn't get this ship, just boosting in circles lol. The Organ Grinder & Co. EVE Heavenly Daughter-Merc Records
Soraya Xel Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 2089	Posted - 2014.04.22 15:14:00 - [10] - Quote Vespasian Andendare wrote: It actually should be longer, considering that you have to stand in full line-of-sight of the tank in order to get the opportunity to fire. Either that or have the ability to lock behind cover. I heard an appealing idea about letting swarms lock onto any vehicle that's been scanned down, which could allow you to fire around cover as a unique niche to the weapon. Obviously you'd still have to manage the same obstacle avoidance with it you do now, but you could lock from behind a crate, and arc the swarms over the crate, for example. I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate

Alena Ventrallis PAND3M0N1UM Top Men. 1206	Posted - 2014.04.22 17:37:00 - [11] - Quote Heavenly Daughter wrote: Should be at least equal to the range of the blaster turret of tanks Since blaster optimal caps out at 85m and effective is 125m, then current lock-on range is sufficient. That's what you get!! - DA Rick
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 377	Posted - 2014.04.22 17:41:00 - [12] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Heavenly Daughter wrote: Should be at least equal to the range of the blaster turret of tanks Since blaster optimal caps out at 85m and effective is 125m, then current lock-on range is sufficient. What is the absolute? (where the efectiveness drops to 0%)
Heavenly Daughter the Aurum Grinder and Company 400	Posted - 2014.04.22 17:53:00 - [13] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Heavenly Daughter wrote: Should be at least equal to the range of the blaster turret of tanks Since blaster optimal caps out at 85m and effective is 125m, then current lock-on range is sufficient. Then this ought to be tested as just missing my feet with the blaster but I couldn't lock onto him. The reason for making the post. So i'll be testing later I guess. The Organ Grinder & Co. EVE Heavenly Daughter-Merc Records
noob cavman Heaven's Lost Property Dirt Nap Squad. 1280	Posted - 2014.04.22 17:53:00 - [14] - Quote Swarms are ina good place right now. But I start the engagement with remotes and av grenades I want to be a caveman! Ccp: DENIED YOU DRUNK Gö+GöüGö+ n+¦pâ+(`-ö´)n+ën+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ Jollys quirky inconsistent sidekick. dem spandex yo


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.