|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Interplanetary Insanitarium
295
   |
Posted - 2014.04.22 02:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Vehicles humping other vehicles til they explode is not bad gameplay. It's totally legit.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so collisions should stay.
Maybe remove vehicle-on-vehicle collision damage but leave any immediate disruption.
That way if I hit a dropship with my derpship I can send it flying into the ground as I smash down on it without exploding.
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
Interplanetary Insanitarium
295
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 04:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Unintentional mechanics are what makes New Eden what it is. It's a sandbox. The whole idea is for people to use creativity and smarts to defeat otherwise insurmountable foes. Jihad jeeps, ramming derpships, that's the very essence of this game.
Well, that's going a bit far.
Unintentional mechanics can break a game to the point of who can utilize it the quickest wins. I.E. CoD with quick scoping.
Collisions aren't an unintentional mechanic, it's just really, really, really, really fun.... Like thinking about taking a speed of light ride.
On the other hand saying vehicle ramming is cheap or lazy just because one person calls out a vehicle to suicide against another vehicle isn't accurate. It's high risk, high reward gameplay.
Errbody need to get objective, yo.
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
Interplanetary Insanitarium
296
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 22:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:I must agree with the amarr, i've played for too long to be rammed by the first idiot able to pilot a DS.
HEY! I'm amarr. And I say being able to ram is okey dokey! So thanks for unconditionally agreeing with what I have to say.
Just remove collision damage and keep environmental damage so i can ram into people at full speed and make them crash. I don't need the kill, I just want to ram people.
But still keep it so that I can gingerly creep up on snipers and squash them. 
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
Interplanetary Insanitarium
296
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 22:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:
Exactly the point. CCP didn't intend jihad jeeps. But CCP did intend to create a game where players can invent their own tactics and strategies. And jihad jeeps embody the very soul of the game that CCP has told us they want to create. A sandbox.
Maybe they did though, intend to make jihad jeeps. If a bunch of kids (not saying you're all kids, but c'mon ...) can think to use a fast vehicle as a murder device why couldn't CCP?
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
Interplanetary Insanitarium
296
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 22:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Temias Mercurial wrote:Interplanetary Insanitarium wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:
Exactly the point. CCP didn't intend jihad jeeps. But CCP did intend to create a game where players can invent their own tactics and strategies. And jihad jeeps embody the very soul of the game that CCP has told us they want to create. A sandbox.
Maybe they did though, intend to make jihad jeeps. If a bunch of kids (not saying you're all kids, but c'mon ...) can think to use a fast vehicle as a murder device why couldn't CCP? They didn't intend murder taxi's, so I find it highly doubtful that Jihad Jeeps were at all intended. They did state that Jihad's were unintended anyway...
Link?
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
|
|
| |
|