|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thumb Green
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
911
   |
Posted - 2014.04.18 12:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:KatanaPT wrote:Matchmaking by Gear I don't know if you have ever played Eve Online, but I will assume you at least know some things about New Eden in my post... Matchmaking by gear goes against New Eden's harsh environment and design philosophy. In Eve you can fit any ship with nearly anything (PG/CPU and slots permitting) and fly it out into the cold, lawless expanses of space. Someone can then come along in a properly fitted ship and blap you right out of the sky. You learn lessons, you fit your ships better, you prioritize your targets better. You get better at Eve Online.
Except in EVE you have High-Sec which is relatively safe. Sure some dipsh!t can come in there with his most expensive ship and just rip the sh!t out you but then what happens is the game punishes him by destroying his ship.
Support Orbital Spawns
|
Thumb Green
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
911
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 12:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fire of Prometheus wrote:
@CCP:
In political philosophy, it is learned that the state has the DUTY to protect it's citizens from themselves. You as the metaphorical state, have the duty to protect us from ourselves by stopping us from killing this game
Fck that noise, the state only has a duty to protect it's citizens from others; so to correct your second sentence, they have a duty to protect new players from us by stopping us from killing this game
Support Orbital Spawns
|
Thumb Green
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
914
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 14:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fire of Prometheus wrote:Thumb Green wrote:Fire of Prometheus wrote:
@CCP:
In political philosophy, it is learned that the state has the DUTY to protect it's citizens from themselves. You as the metaphorical state, have the duty to protect us from ourselves by stopping us from killing this game
Fck that noise, the state only has a duty to protect it's citizens from others; so to correct your second sentence, they have a duty to protect new players from us by stopping us from killing this game That's only part of that duty, the state has a duty to protect it's citizens for themselves, ie. no smoking in certain places etc., no texting and driving. Yes both of those examples can effect others, but remove other people from the scenario and who do they hurt? Themselves.
The Both of those are about protecting people from others. Protecting people that would have done those without the law from themselves is just an inevitable side effect. Protecting people from themselves as a side effect of protecting people from other is just fine but to say they have a duty to protect people from themselves is a bullsh!t excuse made up to justify the state having more power than it ought to and anyone saying they have that duty can go straight to fcking hell.
Support Orbital Spawns
|
Thumb Green
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
916
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 15:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
People keep calling Pyrex a hypocrite but sometimes being a hypocrite just means you're speaking from experience.
Support Orbital Spawns
|
|
|
| |
|