|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
1096
   |
Posted - 2014.04.16 11:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
See what I did? KEQ but with an extra Q? Like... QQ? KEQQ?
They abused Game mechanics...
Is DNS not purposefully abusing game mechanics also to 'show' CCP? 
I reckon that's what KEQ are doing. They're doing us all a favour just like DNS is. Hail KEQ, saviours of Dust \o/
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
18-1 -é-+-ànderdo-+e record || +¦ a-+ -é-+e op+¦a-ée
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
1100
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 11:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
iTbagyou wrote:Any district dns has is free to be attacked. No need to hide behind abusing game mechanics
That wasn't my point, DNS are knowingly and openly abusing the awfully constructed PC mechanics (and rightly so).
Also, how come you left FA?
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
18-1 -é-+-ànderdo-+e record || +¦ a-+ -é-+e op+¦a-ée
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
1100
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 11:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
iTbagyou wrote:843-BANE wrote:iTbagyou wrote:Any district dns has is free to be attacked. No need to hide behind abusing game mechanics That wasn't my point, DNS are knowingly and openly abusing the awfully constructed PC mechanics (and rightly so). Also, how come you left FA? I fail to see abusing by dns. Districts are online, ready to be attacked. Exactly where is that abusing?
I never said they weren't online, never said they couldn't be attacked.
I'm saying the awful PC design has lead DNS to abuse it by taking 100%, and like I said, rightfully so! Someone had to.
How long before you leave Cap ac?
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
18-1 -é-+-ànderdo-+e record || +¦ a-+ -é-+e op+¦a-ée
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
1104
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
I don't condone KEQs actions, this is what I think:
I like KEQ very much, I like a lot of their guys, and they also have members I don't like. That's the truth. However what they've done is not ok, it is honestly in my opinion quite childish, and also futile. I can see the benefits, but surely it would have been obvious that such an uproar and inevitable threat to their clan would be imminent. My point was that I just found the aforementioned uproar funny, because of the way everyone was flying off the handle about it. THAT was what I find funny.
@Tbag you keep repeating your same point about 'not being able to attack back' or whatever, I never even slightly mentioned anything like that. I never even said I disagree with what DNS is doing, in fact I said twice that it's the right thing to do as it is inevitable and profitable for those involved, why wouldn't they do it?
@VIRDJINN (I think Kobrah, right? IDK) No I don't think it's ok. Like I say I think it was a stupid move, and it'll cost them much in reprecussions both publically and quite literally from CCP I imagine. A foolish move indeed, however the reaction was definitely entertaining!
@Cubs I agree with everything you said. This post, like most of posts, was kind of sarcastic. It wasn't exactly in KEQ's favour, I was kind of mocking both DNS (Kujo's original Lolstatement about how he's doing it for the community {that was Kujo, right?}] and KEQ for making a stupid move! I would never dispute with Xero that we have a crap community, but I think every community everywhere is crap from someone's point of view!
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
18-1 -é-+-ànderdo-+e record || +¦ a-+ -é-+e op+¦a-ée
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
1107
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 15:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Games Haven wrote:843-BANE wrote:See what I did? KEQ but with an extra Q? Like... QQ? KEQQ? EDIT: Also managed to capture Kain's reaction to this on tape about in frustration when someone doesn't play by the rule book to get their way! Fake He's using a remote instead of a pan.
You found the loophole, damn.
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
18-1 -é-+-ànderdo-+e record || +¦ a-+ -é-+e op+¦a-ée
|
|
|
| |
|