I didn't report anything about the first one because before I could the next morning I was contacted my a GM saying I would be refunded for both of the packs.

I received notification at around 10am, noticed it around 12pm. At that time I was told that exactly ONE of my corp's battles were incorrectly allowed through. Whatever the case, by the time I got to my apartment at 1230 to sacrifice my day sorting it out, the described rescheduling and onlining had already happened.



This is incorrect. I was, as previously stated contacted the next day, I can grab a pic of the communication if you'd like proof.


It wasn't my intent to say that you were reporting as well, this is merely my side of the situation. You weren't part of the defending corp, so how can you possibly claim that what the GM's told you about rescheduling proves anything about what actually happened to the districts?

---

I'm really intrigued how you know this. Should discuss this with me sometime what proof you have that lead to this statement.

I don't have proof to provide. When I made it home, STB had attacked one of KEQ's districts which was newly onlined. There were two battles on it. KEQ's officers immediately moved to attack the other ones with the locking corp because we had no idea what was going on, but didn't want more attacks from STB or similar hitting the districts.

So you relocked a district that had an attack on it when they had rescheduled it once already. :/



There were two battles which involved Fatal Absolution. The first had been rescheduled in such a way that FA's attack was the only one against that district. You lost.

This is incorrect. I was given a message that both clone packs would be refunded, and both were later, because it was not the first attack scheduled.

the battle that was first in the que, and thus should have been the only one to occur, was the 2nd battle to happen that night for us. That battle we did indeed win while losing 34 clones in the process. The district remained 'under attack' in the same manner as last night and the clones lost were not reflected on the star map.

I said the battles involved FA- whether or not they "should have" happened I have no idea after all the GM intervention.


This is incorrect. Because our battle was the first to be scheduled, it was allowed to go through, according to the GM. We won that battle but due to you locking it again after first 'losing' the locking war by coming in AFTER our battle, the battle you later scheduled should have been nullified as well.

Proof that this was the intention is documented in the ticket I filed. He reduced the district by the amount of clones lost (around 130) and nullified the results of your battle later. However he didn't understand that I was unable to send a reup after the win BECAUSE of your later attacks.

Which is what I reported in the following paragraph. All I know is that the battle fought there was nullified. Our accounts jibe. Again, we had launched and attack on this district because it was online after GM intervention.


So this portion has nothing to do with my post because it was on a separate unrelated district? Awesome sauce.

Yes, because it explains the situation in full, especially in regards to how much GM intervention was going on.