Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Exodeon Salviej
The Phoenix Federation
84
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 14:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
I dunno what everyones' take is on this, which is why I'm asking. It's been a pretty good while, I haven't even been here since beta, and even I think we should have at least a LITTLE something more than just Ambush, Skirmish, and Domination.
So, with all due respect, and the boredom of me, and a few others, should we start pushing for a new game mode?
It doesn't have to be anything big, for all I care, it could be deathmatch; No Extra clones, once you're dead, you're dead. No teams. Something to test new suits with, and/or for the lone wolfs on Dust.
Your face is something to shoot, so I will shoot. Don't be offended, I do it to everyone.
Commandoooo punch! >:D
|
xXGXx MAN
RisingSuns Dark Taboo
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 14:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
For anyone that has ever played mag, i think the aqquisition game mode where u had to steal the transports would be awesome in dust.
Improvise, adapt, overcome!
R.I.P-MAG
Amarr Logibro
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1719
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 14:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Exodeon Salviej wrote:So, with all due respect, and the boredom of me, and a few others, should we start pushing for a new game mode?
You can push for something all you want; CCP's development speed is so slow that they can't respond to player needs in any reasonable amount of time (see: passive skills still aren't being applied). CCP is not agile.
Your best bet is to take a few months off. We might be getting some new stuff in the first expansion, but who knows when we will get that...
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
OliX PRZESMIEWCA
Bezimienni...
80
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
A mode where one team need to hack objective and second team need to hold it as long they can. If team no.1 hack the objective for example in 5min, other team got same amount of time to hack it back. If 10 min pass without objective been hacked, other team got 10min time as well. |
Mortishai Belmont
G.L.O.R.Y RISE of LEGION
112
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think ambush should be replaced with team death match in a close quarters environment (No vehicles), a vehicle mode (tank and ADS fleets can face off), In-door complex maps; a building with 3 levels or something.
There are tons of idea and no one working on them >w<
G.L.O.R.Y solider,
Master of the Gallente Heavy
|
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1840
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
OliX PRZESMIEWCA wrote:A mode where one team need to hack objective and second team need to hold it as long they can. If team no.1 hack the objective for example in 5min, other team got same amount of time to hack it back. If 10 min pass without objective been hacked, other team got 10min time as well. Yup, this is a time-honored game mode proven effective by many, many FPS games. (I'm thinking of Escort mode from A.V.A.)
Nerdier than thou
|
Lv2spd2
Slow And Old
280
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
OliX PRZESMIEWCA wrote:A mode where one team need to hack objective and second team need to hold it as long they can. If team no.1 hack the objective for example in 5min, other team got same amount of time to hack it back. If 10 min pass without objective been hacked, other team got 10min time as well.
I've seen plenty of games where the 1st team took the point and the other team would have NEVER taken it away. I presume those games would on forever?
|
Awry Barux
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
1840
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lv2spd2 wrote:OliX PRZESMIEWCA wrote:A mode where one team need to hack objective and second team need to hold it as long they can. If team no.1 hack the objective for example in 5min, other team got same amount of time to hack it back. If 10 min pass without objective been hacked, other team got 10min time as well. I've seen plenty of games where the 1st team took the point and the other team would have NEVER taken it away. I presume those games would on forever? No, the other team loses if the timer, set equal to how long it took the first team to take the point, runs out.
Nerdier than thou
|
OliX PRZESMIEWCA
Bezimienni...
80
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 16:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
I think we are unable to create fair challenge when squad of fresh players can (they are forced) participate with squad where overal SP points are far more than 200. |
Exodeon Salviej
The Phoenix Federation
85
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Exodeon Salviej wrote:So, with all due respect, and the boredom of me, and a few others, should we start pushing for a new game mode? You can push for something all you want; CCP's development speed is so slow that they can't respond to player needs in any reasonable amount of time (see: passive skills still aren't being applied). CCP is not agile. Your best bet is to take a few months off. We might be getting some new stuff in the first expansion, but who knows when we will get that...
You type of cynical people aren't something I'm too fond of, just saying. As much as your input is appreciated, you're just shooting down the topic without giving it any thought. And really, to me...it's gotten old. Would you answer this question better if I said, "What if CCP could meet player demands, what kind of game mode would you want?" Is that better? Are you satisfied? I hope so... Yes, CCP can't do a lot of things right now. I'm pretty sure EVERYONE knows it by now, so really...why is there such a need to repeat what has been stated more than a 100 times already on this forum? Scratch that, I think it'd be 1000 times. Nonetheless, I'm still here, I've been here for several months, almost a year, and I have not complained once aside from the constructive criticism I have given. Complaining is a wonderful thing, I congratulate you for voicing your opinion(Edit: Complaining that something is wrong helps people fix things, and make it better. I approve of this, but not when it's just reiterating things that have already been said.) But at this point, and since the start of it, WHEN did it ever really help? What you just said to me right then, and there was, "This game sucks." No pointers on what could be done to make it better, no pointers on when it could be done, or how. Remind me not to ask you for constructive criticism in the future.
Your face is something to shoot, so I will shoot. Don't be offended, I do it to everyone.
Commandoooo punch! >:D
|
|
R F Gyro
Clones 4u
1282
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Two weeks to fanfest. Devs won't tell you anything right now.
And I suspect they may already be aware that some of their players might have some level of interest in additional content.
RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
|
Exodeon Salviej
The Phoenix Federation
85
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
R F Gyro wrote:Two weeks to fanfest. Devs won't tell you anything right now.
And I suspect they may already be aware that some of their players might have some level of interest in additional content.
Yeah, I can understand that. But just throw a few ideas out there. It's nice to fantasize once in a while.
Your face is something to shoot, so I will shoot. Don't be offended, I do it to everyone.
Commandoooo punch! >:D
|
Denn Maell
PIanet Express Canis Eliminatus Operatives
275
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
Squad Vs. Squad on any game mode. My squad was in Oceania and ran a dom against another squad. It was really fun, just like dom or ambush just really less cluster f*** and more able to cope and strategically position and coordinate with my squad much easier.
I've always liked the idea of a vehicle ONLY map. Give tank drivers a chance to test their mettle against each other without the whole 'big fish little pond' we are all used to.
The most OP weapon on the Dust Battle Field:
One good logi, one rep tool, and a heavy.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |