|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arcanine Rising
Fatal Rainbow Holdings
3
   |
Posted - 2014.04.14 13:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
These idea's aren't the answer.
Spawn timers away from a home district?
This is a terrible idea. Why should I have to spawn in slower for a battle...giving a handicap to the other team?
I'm all for handicaps that get us back to skirmish 1.0 in PC...but adding seconds to a spawn modifier is a bad idea.
Penalties to ringers? This is just an annoyance, not an answer.
Being mercenaries in new eden should be encouraged, not limited.
If corporations in New Eden had accessible means to attack as often as they wished with the proper clones to fight, then there's 240 battles that could be fought every other day...an average of 120 a day.
It's a sandbox bro, don't box others out with poor ideas that fit your agenda:
PEOPLE SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OWN SO MANY DISTRICTS QQ MAKE IT STAHP WITH RULES!
RINGERS BAD! LET'S PENALIZE!
Empower others, don't restrict. |
Arcanine Rising
Fatal Rainbow Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 00:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
THUNDERGROOVE wrote:Text Grant wrote:How many of those players actually participate in important PC's? 18? We have a couple hundred people who are "PC ready". You guys just don't attack enough for everyone to get fights.
Lawl...dude couldn't understand how many PC players we have even if he was a part.
In FA alone we have enough for 2 teams when we need 2.
among DNS with AE, FA, and ERA/TP you couldsee 6 teams.
And everyone is rotated out when oyu don't have much PC.
They don't play the 16 best or the others that make up your depth would leave.
If you knew the way PC worked you'd know these corps want to play as much of their players as possible or risk them feeling inferior or something and cause them to leave. |
Arcanine Rising
Fatal Rainbow Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 00:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Arcanine Rising wrote:These idea's aren't the answer.
Spawn timers away from a home district?
This is a terrible idea. Why should I have to spawn in slower for a battle...giving a handicap to the other team?
I'm all for handicaps that get us back to skirmish 1.0 in PC...but adding seconds to a spawn modifier is a bad idea.
Penalties to ringers? This is just an annoyance, not an answer.
Being mercenaries in new eden should be encouraged, not limited.
If corporations in New Eden had accessible means to attack as often as they wished with the proper clones to fight, then there's 240 battles that could be fought every other day...an average of 120 a day.
It's a sandbox bro, don't box others out with poor ideas that fit your agenda:
PEOPLE SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OWN SO MANY DISTRICTS QQ MAKE IT STAHP WITH RULES!
RINGERS BAD! LET'S PENALIZE!
Empower others, don't restrict. If you wish to do away with all rules then by all means lets have no timers to attack as the person before you suggested. But when players know two days beforehand that all their best players need to be online for a battle, then only a select few players get to participate in a game mode ment for everyone. I don't want to keep good players out of PC. I just think that it shouldn't be exclusive to less than 100 players. The 'rules" I put up would not stop anyone from being a merc either. As long as you are fighting as a ringer and own no districts in your corp there would be no extra penalty. The only thing that this would accomplish would be to give more people the oppertunity to participate in PC. A single corp could hold over 30 districts without having penalty on a single one of them if placed in the right area. That is about 15 battles a day. This would in no way limit the ammount of PC a player could participate in. So please, say again why this is a bad idea?
(facepalm)
Now you aren't being compelling you've resorted to shifting the spotlight instead of defending why your ideas are plausible or refuting the qualms i've raised.
In the best corps you can only field that 1 team at 1 battle...so if they have 5 timers in an hour how will they defend with those same 16 as you suggest?
Your guess that it's the same 100 is artibrary and incorrect. Not even close tbh.
|
Arcanine Rising
Fatal Rainbow Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 03:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Arcanine Rising wrote:Text Grant wrote:Arcanine Rising wrote:These idea's aren't the answer.
Spawn timers away from a home district?
This is a terrible idea. Why should I have to spawn in slower for a battle...giving a handicap to the other team?
I'm all for handicaps that get us back to skirmish 1.0 in PC...but adding seconds to a spawn modifier is a bad idea.
Penalties to ringers? This is just an annoyance, not an answer.
Being mercenaries in new eden should be encouraged, not limited.
If corporations in New Eden had accessible means to attack as often as they wished with the proper clones to fight, then there's 240 battles that could be fought every other day...an average of 120 a day.
It's a sandbox bro, don't box others out with poor ideas that fit your agenda:
PEOPLE SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OWN SO MANY DISTRICTS QQ MAKE IT STAHP WITH RULES!
RINGERS BAD! LET'S PENALIZE!
Empower others, don't restrict. If you wish to do away with all rules then by all means lets have no timers to attack as the person before you suggested. But when players know two days beforehand that all their best players need to be online for a battle, then only a select few players get to participate in a game mode ment for everyone. I don't want to keep good players out of PC. I just think that it shouldn't be exclusive to less than 100 players. The 'rules" I put up would not stop anyone from being a merc either. As long as you are fighting as a ringer and own no districts in your corp there would be no extra penalty. The only thing that this would accomplish would be to give more people the oppertunity to participate in PC. A single corp could hold over 30 districts without having penalty on a single one of them if placed in the right area. That is about 15 battles a day. This would in no way limit the ammount of PC a player could participate in. So please, say again why this is a bad idea? (facepalm) Now you aren't being compelling you've resorted to shifting the spotlight instead of defending why your ideas are plausible or refuting the qualms i've raised. In the best corps you can only field that 1 team at 1 battle...so if they have 5 timers in an hour how will they defend with those same 16 as you suggest? Your guess that it's the same 100 is artibrary and incorrect. Not even close tbh. If there are so many PC players in DNS, then this would actually not hurt them at all. So why are you crying?
(facepalm even harder)
Hey bro you won't be affected so please say it's a good idea when the problems previously proffered still stand...
Case closed bring in the dancing lobsters?
|
|
|
| |
|