DUST Search - CCP Saberwing, Whiny Community, and Content

anaboop wrote:

Maximos Forcus wrote:

Asking for an ISK and asset reset is the same as asking for a complete restart of the game, as they are the principal element of the game-environment, the "EVE-DUST universe".

Not wiping it will not make the rich richer, nor the poor poorer. It will actually allow the poor to make some ISK out of weapons that will not significantly help them make more ISK or be more than marginally better on the battlefield. This is effectively the same discussion as PRO vs. STD/MLT. Not fun maybe, but part of the game.

If the market domination is beneficial to the "rich few", which is what I gather fro your responses, then a reset will not help "the poor" at all. Corporations will hold districts, making money faster than any corp only running battles. Lone mercs will suffer even more. In the end, it is about the ability to make ISK. So you would need a full reset of everything.

Then, once DUST gets connected to EVE, allowing for player-exchange, do you reset EVE? You think that makes sense?

We never asked for asset reset you suggested it in an attempt to deter us which didnt work so now your just grasping at straws.

If you want to spread the wealth, then take everyones isk pool it together and spread it out evenly to each ip address or whatever.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
deepfried salad gilliam Sanguine Knights 649	Posted - 2014.04.10 11:12:00 - [1] - Quote VALCORE72 wrote: dont care if you were a mathematician . this is a GAME where balance is need for growth . so your sayn for the higher corps it was ok to lock districts for 4 months ? never use real life in a online game will make you grey headed fast . isk and items wipe should put the market on good start . pubs and pc would be up and coming from ppl trying to farm . farming is what makes mmos and since i was told this a mmo makes sense a fresh start from a isk , item wipe wouldnt hurt . ccp let it go for far to long and when a market is added it pay for it . you do know there are corps waitn for a market just so they can buy all the officer gear for pc ? few corps are settn on over 200billion . isk wipe all the way . i would take it even when im setn on 215 mil my self well thatll put officer weapons in high demand then right? so i could charge a lot of isk for mine right? and then those corps give me wealth for my items. boom! wealth redistributed. It'll help define roles, i promise:)
deepfried salad gilliam Sanguine Knights 649	Posted - 2014.04.10 11:14:00 - [2] - Quote anaboop wrote: Maximos Forcus wrote: Asking for an ISK and asset reset is the same as asking for a complete restart of the game, as they are the principal element of the game-environment, the "EVE-DUST universe". Not wiping it will not make the rich richer, nor the poor poorer. It will actually allow the poor to make some ISK out of weapons that will not significantly help them make more ISK or be more than marginally better on the battlefield. This is effectively the same discussion as PRO vs. STD/MLT. Not fun maybe, but part of the game. If the market domination is beneficial to the "rich few", which is what I gather fro your responses, then a reset will not help "the poor" at all. Corporations will hold districts, making money faster than any corp only running battles. Lone mercs will suffer even more. In the end, it is about the ability to make ISK. So you would need a full reset of everything. Then, once DUST gets connected to EVE, allowing for player-exchange, do you reset EVE? You think that makes sense? We never asked for asset reset you suggested it in an attempt to deter us which didnt work so now your just grasping at straws. If you want to spread the wealth, then take everyones isk pool it together and spread it out evenly to each ip address or whatever. well if you isk wipe with no asset wipe, ill just buy all the proto gear i can afford and then im still more wealth than others and plus any sort of wipe would halt the growth of the player market It'll help define roles, i promise:)