study did not recognize the frequent nerf and buff cycle. bad science.

I noticed in the comments a bunch of people saying the same thing, I find it deeply saddening that people who have the intelligence to breathe regard science and the pursuit of knowledge with such contempt, I was reading the comments on an article a few weeks back regarding some science related to the big bang, people actually said something along the lines of "why bother researching things like this when we can't even find a plane missing on earth!"

The real question that should be asked is why haven't scientist found away to stop stupid people from breeding and speaking.

Look at what you wouldn't have if scientists let small minded fools hold them back

Im very pro sciance you missed my point by appling culture preduce on me assuming i think like a set subgroup of people of people. People like yourself would have locked me 50 years ago because i share mental health trates of mass muders when in fact im harmless.


THE POINT i was trying to make is studies like this are nornally funding grabs on a contravual subject for the sake of employment and dont really push science forword and instead they take conmon_knowlage and then apply a method that will most likely agree with it.

That is what i have a issue with snappy headline sciance that leads to people not getting vaccines because some **** said it might be dangerous.

This study basically agrees with standard and agreed human behavior patters. But i heading "humans find loss pof control or negative outside influences frustrating" which could have been proven by studying people in a car with bad steering on country lines while stuck in traffic.

Maybe this game is better suited to you. Give it a try! It's totally balanced.