|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
1855
   |
Posted - 2014.04.05 19:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
I support this post. Entirely.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
1866
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kristoff Atruin wrote:Couple of thoughts here. Owning land should be profitable, which means passive isk needs to be part of it.
This isn't true.
It should, in fact, cost money to hold a district. However, active combat in PC should be extremely profitable. So your income comes from actively using the district, either via attacking or defending and winning. This encourages people to fight instead of sitting on what they have. Therefore, you want to massively increase the payout in PC for clones lost in combat, while massively nerfing the payout of excess clones generated from holding the district (or eliminating it entirely). Then you have more reason to fight than to blue up.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
1907
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kain, how would you feel about pushing for the removal/replacement of districts with whole planets being a single district/combat area? It would allow CCP to spread DUST to more regions without rampantly increasing the district count.
I don't think the total number of districts should rise much, but given how much EVE participation is relevant to where EVE groups live, I think it'd be ideal to get DUST in as many regions as possible. Reducing or removing the district pile would allow region proliferation without district proliferation.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
1910
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
I think a drastic reduction in districts per planet, and a move to a much wider distribution of districts over multiple regions would help more groups get involved, as different ones will have dominant EVE support in different areas. It makes district ownership location-relevant, something that we're badly missing.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
1969
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 14:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I think CCP understands that there are complex issues regarding Planetary Conquest with some potentially straight forward changes. The most important of these issues being passive ISK and clone pack size.
So when do we get fixes?
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
|
|
| |
|