|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6346
   |
Posted - 2014.04.02 18:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:
Been there, done that.
Can I get my cookie now?
You were killed by the same person 100 times?
Lol?
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6346
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 18:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
How dare we have variety
We should only be allowed to fit 1 of each module and all have the same fit
You think this is a sandbox? no this is concrete where we tell you how to play, when to kill, when to hack and when to die
It's not like AV has variety either.
Only 2 Weapons actually worth a damn (usually 1 depending on the situation), and the fittings all involve Damage Mod stacking.
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6346
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 18:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:We tried reason, you didn't listen, so now it's time to play by your rules.
Nerf Armor Plate stacking, it's so OP, it can make you nigh unkillable especially if you have someone repping you.
Nerf Profile Dampener stacking, it can make you unscannable even by vehicle scanners.
Nerf Kin Cat stacking, it can actually make you so fast that you are almost impossible to track.
Nerf Cardiac Regs, they can make your stamina way too high and regen way too fast.
Nerf Codebreakers, they can make you hack way too fast.
I could go on, but I wont, but I could. Did I mention CPU Upgrades? Nerf those too.
How does it feel?
Now how about presenting video evidence with explanation about how these are gamebreaking like the Infantry side did?
(Technically it was presented by a neutral party, but the evidence did enforce the Infantry side's point)
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6346
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 18:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Thumb Green wrote:
Except you're not using logic, not even infantry logic as you put it; you're like one of those kids that put a sarcastic twist on what people say because they hurt your feelings.
Hold on (of course you wont actually have to hold on as you read this), I am gonna go and quickly look for the closest infantry statement that I can find. And here we are: pyramidhead 420 wrote:should be zero stacking in this game period. maximum, one of each mod per fit. that way, fitting something would require a brain, instead of how much hp can I stack and rep
The statement of 1 person does not equate to the general consensus of an entire community subset.
Or would it be fair to say that EnglishSnake & Spkr4TheDead share the common beliefs and goals of the entire Pilot community?
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6346
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 18:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:
Which video are you referring to? I would be very interested to know. If you are talking about the CEO Pyrex's video linked earlier today then I can only laugh at how much attention you paid to that video.
Video proof and explanation about why Hardeners (and Dropships by proxy) needed to be fixed.
Here
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6347
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 19:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Derrith Erador wrote:
are you fighting subpar tankers? because that is the only time you should be able to solo a tank.
Then by those standards, pilots should only be able to solo subpar AV.
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6347
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 19:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:
Lol Armor Repped tank is terribad against good players. Just wanted to get that out of the way first. Now, I never said hardener stacking without any sort of penalties was balanced, on the contrary, it wasn't, I just think they needed a tweak, not a direct nerf, as now the only way to make them effective is to stack them.
So now everyone who doesn't have a vehicle or Wyrikomi Breach Forge Gun is bad?
You say that as if tankers wouldn't stack hardeners anyways. 
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6350
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 21:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:
Do you have to twist everything I say?
Answer the question.
Either your defending a crutch (which wouldn't surprise me), or your calling everyone who doesn't have either a Wyrikomi Breach Forge Gun or Vehicle a bad player.
MarasdF Loron wrote:
They probably would, but if it had downsides to it they would have to actually plan accordingly when to use them. For instance, my proposal for Shield Hardeners was to keep 60% but give 30% reduction to top speed and acceleration, so 90% if all 3 are active. You are basically almost immobile. And for Armor Hardeners 40% and 25% speed and acceleration reduction. So if they stacked 2 they would have lost half their speed when they activated both.
That wouldn't solve the V vs. AV issue.
The problem was the fact that people were cycling their hardeners so they could have a permanent resistance, not people activating all their hardeners at the same time for a stronger resistance.
Unless the speed penalty would apply at all times, pilots would still be able to stack hardeners indefinitely, and still be able to evade at the speed of sound when if their hardeners were down. You'd just have 30% less speed or acceleration.
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6355
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 02:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:EDIT: Ok, I think it's time to end this troll, thanks for all the fun guys, you were great. Except Charlotte, I expected much more from you.  I really don't give a sh!t about your puny infantry modules. For all I care you can have small nukes that oblitirate all enemy vehicles on the battlefield.  Have fun guys!
In order to be played like a fiddle, people would've had to believe you were actually serious. 
4/10
Fails at emulating the logic from the Anti-Vehicle User's POV, but did manage to hold some arguments within the thread. Also gets a point for consistency.
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6355
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 02:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:
Dude don't even start with that **** you are terrible at emulating the mind of a tanker and just jump to Spkr mindset..... be is the last person who should represent vehicles.....period.
Do I need to link all of the posts from pilots saying that an AV weapon shouldn't solo them? Especially b/c of something as arbitrary as ISK, SP, and even a promotional video.
It's far more than just Spkr4TheDead & EnglishSnake who say the things I make parodies of, and they all have non Spkr4TheDead & EnglishSnake quotes behind them.
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
|
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6378
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 00:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:
I wasn't calling anyone bad, but you are obviously bad. See the difference?
A tanker is talking about skill.
Now I have seen it all. 
The Snack That Smiles Back! "Swarmers"
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|