| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LudiKure ninda
MostlyHarmless.
72
   |
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
If dropships will remain paper planes,can price be lower at least?? 
Why are they so expencive? What is that that makes ADS so expencive??
High rate of fire? Transport capability?
Are they designed ONLY for people who has over 500 mill ISK,so when they lost 5 in a match it barely scratch they'r wallet?
I love my dropship soo much,but my wallet dont..
I wasnt in a farming PC corp,so I dont hawe over 50 mill isk,how Im I suposed to fly them?
Should I quit flyng them? Get gud? How to get gud?? What fitting? What strategy?
PS Sry for my bad english 
Solo player..
SCAN ATTEMPT PREVENTED!
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
2284
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
LudiKure ninda wrote:If dropships will remain paper planes,can price be lower at least?? Why are they so expencive? What is that that makes ADS so expencive?? High rate of fire? Transport capability? Are they designed ONLY for people who has over 500 mill ISK,so when they lost 5 in a match it barely scratch they'r wallet? I love my dropship soo much,but my wallet dont.. I wasnt in a farming PC corp,so I dont hawe over 50 mill isk,how Im I suposed to fly them? Should I quit flyng them? Get gud? How to get gud?? What fitting? What strategy? PS Sry for my bad english
After the railgun nerf we should really wait on this...
For the Federation!
|
LudiKure ninda
MostlyHarmless.
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Then I should probably quit flyng these things...and enjoy being stomped by same tryhards all day long..
Solo player..
SCAN ATTEMPT PREVENTED!
|
darkiller240
WarRavens
League of Infamy
667
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:LudiKure ninda wrote:If dropships will remain paper planes,can price be lower at least?? Why are they so expencive? What is that that makes ADS so expencive?? High rate of fire? Transport capability? Are they designed ONLY for people who has over 500 mill ISK,so when they lost 5 in a match it barely scratch they'r wallet? I love my dropship soo much,but my wallet dont.. I wasnt in a farming PC corp,so I dont hawe over 50 mill isk,how Im I suposed to fly them? Should I quit flyng them? Get gud? How to get gud?? What fitting? What strategy? PS Sry for my bad english After the railgun nerf we should really wait on this...
After hardener nerf ADS are now nearly as weak as 1.6
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
|
LudiKure ninda
MostlyHarmless.
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
darkiller240 wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:LudiKure ninda wrote:If dropships will remain paper planes,can price be lower at least?? Why are they so expencive? What is that that makes ADS so expencive?? High rate of fire? Transport capability? Are they designed ONLY for people who has over 500 mill ISK,so when they lost 5 in a match it barely scratch they'r wallet? I love my dropship soo much,but my wallet dont.. I wasnt in a farming PC corp,so I dont hawe over 50 mill isk,how Im I suposed to fly them? Should I quit flyng them? Get gud? How to get gud?? What fitting? What strategy? PS Sry for my bad english After the railgun nerf we should really wait on this... After hardener nerf ADS are now nearly as weak as 1.6
And why are they still soo damm expencive???
Solo player..
SCAN ATTEMPT PREVENTED!
|
emtbraincase
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'm of the mindset that EVERY vehicle should be "that expensive". LAV's should be about the cost of a proto suit (minus modules) and HAV/Derpships should be no less than a fully proto version of a Logi suit (minimum of 150k isk/vehicle)
No reason a tank, derpship, LAV should cost less than a proto suit that it rarely has to worry about. Cost and desire are the only deterrents to everyone running MLT HAV. If anything I'm all for increasing prices of vehicles. Losing a good 1 now is costly (why u don't see them en masse), but a MLT is cheaper than a well-built ADV suit.
To me that is unacceptable. Yes, some well-tailored suits are more expensive than an automobile, but anything better or equal to a mid-tier car is more than even the most expensive tuxedo. Generally what you wear will ALWAYS cost less than what you drive (assuming you only look at sticker price, since there is no "used" market in Dust).
However, I also agree that we should see the long-term ramifications of the Hardener change. |
LudiKure ninda
MostlyHarmless.
73
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
emtbraincase wrote:I'm of the mindset that EVERY vehicle should be "that expensive". LAV's should be about the cost of a proto suit (minus modules) and HAV/Derpships should be no less than a fully proto version of a Logi suit (minimum of 150k isk/vehicle)
No reason a tank, derpship, LAV should cost less than a proto suit that it rarely has to worry about. Cost and desire are the only deterrents to everyone running MLT HAV. If anything I'm all for increasing prices of vehicles. Losing a good 1 now is costly (why u don't see them en masse), but a MLT is cheaper than a well-built ADV suit.
To me that is unacceptable. Yes, some well-tailored suits are more expensive than an automobile, but anything better or equal to a mid-tier car is more than even the most expensive tuxedo. Generally what you wear will ALWAYS cost less than what you drive (assuming you only look at sticker price, since there is no "used" market in Dust).
However, I also agree that we should see the long-term ramifications of the Hardener change.
Tanks should get their old price,2 mill per tank,maybe more..
Solo player..
SCAN ATTEMPT PREVENTED!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |