DUST Search - CCP - Just remove vehicles already

Shijima Kuraimaru wrote:

KaTaLy5t-87 wrote:

ANON Cerberus wrote:

I don't think anyone on the forums has said that they want DUST to be like call of duty.

In fact if anything I would propose CCP take a Battlefield-esq approach to vehicles. By this I mean, make vehicles both cheaper and less tanky, however give them some form of countermeasures so that good tanking comes down to awareness and precise timing of ~modules~.
I assume changes like this would mean tanks in general would die more / quicker - however this is a good thing. At the same time CCP could make tanks / vehicles cheaper and thus you then have a situation similar to battlefield where for the most part - vehicles are balanced vs infantry.

The only other option as I see it is to take the other route and make vehicles / tanks akin to ships in eve. However for that to truely work, vehicles would need capacitors. (A pool of energy that is used up as modules and stuff are turned on / activated.)

I honestly do prefer the second option and I do think with a bit of input from the CCP EVE devs, could be awesome. However we know what CCP DUST is like and they are prone to make mistakes so for the sake of good gameplay, the first option of making ~Battlefield-esq~ tank gameplay is probably the way to go.

I agree with the Battlefield kind of approach and I've been saying it for some time now. For the love of God CCP, buy a copy of Battlefield and play it a little bit. You will notice that the vehicles are FREE, yes FREE! And they are not OP! You can also fire a tank shell from one side of the map to the other without "redline sniping" being an issue. They have their strengths and weaknesses and a good tanker will know these and will play these strengths while knowing when to duck out when their position of strength suddenly changes.

While you are playing Battlefield please please please take note of the air-vehicle controls and notice how they are not akin to flying a brick with another brick hanging off the bottom of it! The controls for vehicles in Dust are shockingly bad and how the vehicles handle is equally bad! Please change this!

Also, I'm pretty sure that modern tank shells can fly for several miles, at what stage in the development of a railgun turret did you guys think 300m was a good max range? Don't get me wrong, I hate the redline rail tankers but nerfing the range to Civil War cannon range is not the way to fix it.

Thank you for not reading this CCP.

KaT

I'm all for HAV rails getting their 600 meter range back... Only if they boost the forge range to match.

The only reason for large rails to keep that range is to stay in the relative safety of the deep redline where nothing but another large rail can touch them.

With a 300 meter range, large rails now have to come into my area of engagement. Welcome to the battlefield.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KaTaLy5t-87 Shadow Company HQ Lokun Listamenn 141	Posted - 2014.03.29 14:10:00 - [1] - Quote ANON Cerberus wrote: I don't think anyone on the forums has said that they want DUST to be like call of duty. In fact if anything I would propose CCP take a Battlefield-esq approach to vehicles. By this I mean, make vehicles both cheaper and less tanky, however give them some form of countermeasures so that good tanking comes down to awareness and precise timing of ~modules~. I assume changes like this would mean tanks in general would die more / quicker - however this is a good thing. At the same time CCP could make tanks / vehicles cheaper and thus you then have a situation similar to battlefield where for the most part - vehicles are balanced vs infantry. The only other option as I see it is to take the other route and make vehicles / tanks akin to ships in eve. However for that to truely work, vehicles would need capacitors. (A pool of energy that is used up as modules and stuff are turned on / activated.) I honestly do prefer the second option and I do think with a bit of input from the CCP EVE devs, could be awesome. However we know what CCP DUST is like and they are prone to make mistakes so for the sake of good gameplay, the first option of making ~Battlefield-esq~ tank gameplay is probably the way to go. I agree with the Battlefield kind of approach and I've been saying it for some time now. For the love of God CCP, buy a copy of Battlefield and play it a little bit. You will notice that the vehicles are FREE, yes FREE! And they are not OP! You can also fire a tank shell from one side of the map to the other without "redline sniping" being an issue. They have their strengths and weaknesses and a good tanker will know these and will play these strengths while knowing when to duck out when their position of strength suddenly changes. While you are playing Battlefield please please please take note of the air-vehicle controls and notice how they are not akin to flying a brick with another brick hanging off the bottom of it! The controls for vehicles in Dust are shockingly bad and how the vehicles handle is equally bad! Please change this! Also, I'm pretty sure that modern tank shells can fly for several miles, at what stage in the development of a railgun turret did you guys think 300m was a good max range? Don't get me wrong, I hate the redline rail tankers but nerfing the range to Civil War cannon range is not the way to fix it. Thank you for not reading this CCP. KaT
KaTaLy5t-87 Shadow Company HQ Lokun Listamenn 141	Posted - 2014.03.30 03:52:00 - [2] - Quote Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: KaTaLy5t-87 wrote: ANON Cerberus wrote: I don't think anyone on the forums has said that they want DUST to be like call of duty. In fact if anything I would propose CCP take a Battlefield-esq approach to vehicles. By this I mean, make vehicles both cheaper and less tanky, however give them some form of countermeasures so that good tanking comes down to awareness and precise timing of ~modules~. I assume changes like this would mean tanks in general would die more / quicker - however this is a good thing. At the same time CCP could make tanks / vehicles cheaper and thus you then have a situation similar to battlefield where for the most part - vehicles are balanced vs infantry. The only other option as I see it is to take the other route and make vehicles / tanks akin to ships in eve. However for that to truely work, vehicles would need capacitors. (A pool of energy that is used up as modules and stuff are turned on / activated.) I honestly do prefer the second option and I do think with a bit of input from the CCP EVE devs, could be awesome. However we know what CCP DUST is like and they are prone to make mistakes so for the sake of good gameplay, the first option of making ~Battlefield-esq~ tank gameplay is probably the way to go. I agree with the Battlefield kind of approach and I've been saying it for some time now. For the love of God CCP, buy a copy of Battlefield and play it a little bit. You will notice that the vehicles are FREE, yes FREE! And they are not OP! You can also fire a tank shell from one side of the map to the other without "redline sniping" being an issue. They have their strengths and weaknesses and a good tanker will know these and will play these strengths while knowing when to duck out when their position of strength suddenly changes. While you are playing Battlefield please please please take note of the air-vehicle controls and notice how they are not akin to flying a brick with another brick hanging off the bottom of it! The controls for vehicles in Dust are shockingly bad and how the vehicles handle is equally bad! Please change this! Also, I'm pretty sure that modern tank shells can fly for several miles, at what stage in the development of a railgun turret did you guys think 300m was a good max range? Don't get me wrong, I hate the redline rail tankers but nerfing the range to Civil War cannon range is not the way to fix it. Thank you for not reading this CCP. KaT I'm all for HAV rails getting their 600 meter range back... Only if they boost the forge range to match. The only reason for large rails to keep that range is to stay in the relative safety of the deep redline where nothing but another large rail can touch them. With a 300 meter range, large rails now have to come into my area of engagement. Welcome to the battlefield. I'm all for stopping the redline rail sniping, nothing annoys me more than some dude sitting back in his tank sniping infantry and the odd tank and going 12/0 while making no meaningful contribution to the battle. I was just trying to draw some comparisons between tanking in Dust and tanking in Battlefield, obviously they are very different games but my observation was that redline tank sniping is almost nonexistent in Battlefield. The main reason for this is because air vehicles can fly over the redzone in Battlefield. You can attempt to redline snipe in Battlefield but I can almost guarantee someone will come along in a jet or attack chopper and pound you into the ground. I think CCP are tackling the redline tank sniping issue in the wrong way. Instead of nerfing the range of the rail why not give people a number of effective ways of countering a redline tank sniper? (other than just another rail tank). I agree with the general consensus that CCP just can't seem to get vehicles right in Dust and I think part of the reason for this is because they are trying to do too much with too few vehicles. They are trying to cover a wide variety of roles with essentially just two combat vehicles, the HAV and Dropship. I hate to keep harking back to Battlefield but look at all the different vehicles they have to cover all the roles in thag game. You have light transport vehicles in the form of jeeps and such, medium transport vehicles that are good against infantry and light armour targets in the form of IFVs and then the heavy armour that is best suited to fighting other heavy armour. In the air you have transport choppers for getting people from A to B, light attack choppers that can carry a small number of guys while being effective against infantry and light armour and then the heavy attack choppers and jets to combat heavy armour and other air vehicles. CCP are trying to fulfill all these roles with the same two vehicles just with different turrets or fittings. I know CCP probably don't give a monkeys what we think anyway and that I have probably wasted several minutes of my life writing this but I like when there is a reasonable and somewhat constructive conversation going on about something. Perhaps the OP might take heed from some of the replies on this thread and instead of QQ-ing like a ***** in future he might come up with something constructive to say or, failing that, refrain from posting his QQ crap in the first place.