|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
3665
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 04:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
I believe the cloak does not require the sacrifice CCP said it should. A scout with a cloak should really be forced to operate on pre 1.8 levels, where they may have to forgo the extra EQ and slot to preserve the cloak.
Right now? Fit whatever the hell you want, hell fit two because that's still completely viable and does not demand the sacrifice it nearly should.
I have no problem seeing cloaked scouts, or picking them up on my passive scan (galscout) but really my beef is that weapon switching occurs way to fast. The cloak offers visual and TACNET stealth all packaged in a piece of EQ slightly more expensive to fit than an Uplink.
The main issue with that is that you have a great defensive, offensive, and traveling asset that does not inhibit your combat abilities. Cloak needs to inhibit your combat abilities, it should not be for those with the lack of skill. The cloak needs to be more thought oriented than just "I'll activate my active dampener, run around and shotgun people". Doing the kind of monkey business that's going on now should get most cloaked scouts killed, but because there is no significant delay in switching weapons, there is not really any risk in that.
ATM, being discovered when cloaked is not a disadvantage, because in lightning speed you can have your weapon out again.
Everything else is perfectly fine. |
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
3665
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 04:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:I'm having a problem with the CPM giving his own opinions about what he agrees with, disagrees with, or what he could "work with".
CPM should relay info that the community is feeling without their own personal opinion. They are representing the community's decision. And that should be the only one being discussed with CCP, regardless of what they feel they could "work with" or not. CCP > What do you think of cloaks. CPM > Spouts word for word the community CCP > You're contradicting yourself... what is it? good or bad? CPM > Everything With it is right and wrong according to the community. Please don't take the time to make these replies I'd rather that time spent post something....constructive? CPM is a responsibility and I get it, you take answers from the community, but it's your job to make sense of it, Detective Encyclopedia Brown. |
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
3666
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 04:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Cotsy, no one cares. You run a cloak just like everyone else. Quit your bullkitten. If you're not going to contribute constructively stay out of the thread. I know right? His QQ is getting sloppy as all ****. Please disregard his QQ then, I'd rather get some minor tweaks (nerfs) on the cloak from reasonable perspectives than nerf hammer the hell out of it.
I'm quickly getting sick of exploits caused by the cloak as well but I at least try to single out a single area and not be so broad about it. I try to give feedback not rant.
That is why you and everyone should just ignore this person....Cotsy |
|
|
|