|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
371
   |
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Been just trolling around in my Winrugar today, being a generally terrible tanker. With the new AV rewards, shooting vehicles has brought my average match payment from 230k ISK to 400k ISK  Or at least that's how it feels, I never make this much usually and now it's the new normal lol
do you understand what buff even means, brah?
do you even understand how to make sick gains like me, brah? |
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
373
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 01:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Alpha 443-6732 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Been just trolling around in my Winrugar today, being a generally terrible tanker. With the new AV rewards, shooting vehicles has brought my average match payment from 230k ISK to 400k ISK Or at least that's how it feels, I never make this much usually and now it's the new normal lol do you understand what buff even means, brah? do you even understand how to make sick gains like me, brah? To buff is to increase effectiveness. My HAV is now more effective at farming ISK. Ergo, my HAV was buffed
If you make something look nicer is that a buff as well to you? |
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
373
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Alpha 443-6732 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Alpha 443-6732 wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Been just trolling around in my Winrugar today, being a generally terrible tanker. With the new AV rewards, shooting vehicles has brought my average match payment from 230k ISK to 400k ISK Or at least that's how it feels, I never make this much usually and now it's the new normal lol do you understand what buff even means, brah? do you even understand how to make sick gains like me, brah? To buff is to increase effectiveness. My HAV is now more effective at farming ISK. Ergo, my HAV was buffed If you make something look nicer is that a buff as well to you? Does it increase the effectiveness of the asset in some way? If so, then yes. If not, then no. Killing a Baloch with my blaster nets me 315 WP if it only has a single occupant. That is more than I will typically get with any kind of AV, and in a much shorter span of time. It was a buff, maybe not to combat effectiveness, but to ISK and WP efficiency.
It increases the effectiveness of the aesthetics
|
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
374
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 11:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yagihige wrote:Major oversight.
This additional WP should be awarded only to damage done to vehicles with AV weapons, not with other vehicles/turrets.
why, exactly? Damage to vehicles is damage to vehicles and thats that. A railgun is an AV weapon as well. |
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
374
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 01:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
I still firmly believe that vehicle AV should be rewarded. However, it seems there are a lot of bugs to this system that you guys are describing, so maybe it needs to be adjusted several times for it to be fair to both sides.
Back on the vehicle AV reward topic, if I am in my missile gunny and suppressing some moron in the redline trying to gib me all game, I feel there should be some sort or reward. But like people are saying, it seems to be bugged right now like the way killing someone in an LAV sometimes gives kill assists per person (I think if you damage them before killing the LAV).
So lets not remove vehicle AV wp please, just adjust it and iron out the bugs. Once Infantry AV is rebalanced it will feel a lot more fairer on the WP earning side because by nature infantry AV can be easily hidden in comparison to vehicle AV, but in turn does less damage.
So what I hope for the future is:
Vehicle WP- Fast way of getting damage WP but also much more risky (with increased cost of MLT hulls to around that of a STD)
Infantry WP- Slightly slower way of gaining WP but has more potential to be secure and therefore less risky (with buffed potency of AV weapons and more AV tools being released) |
|
|
| |
|