DUST Search - Cloaks have ruined the game..?

All Channels

General Discussions

Cloaks have ruined the game..?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cotsy8 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 86	Posted - 2014.03.25 17:55:00 - [1] - Quote poison Diego wrote: This here is a whole new game. When people who dont have gungame just activate cloak in a middle of 1vs1? thats just sad... Cloak was never needed and does not fit any role in dust(maybe NK assassins) I am a scout and Im telling you that I DONT NEED CLOAK!!! EDIT: btw there will be no new-comers now... FIX IT SCOUTS DO NOT NEED A CLOAK - 100% agree Cloaks are stupid, no reason to have them in game. They are a negative, not a positive. Get rid of cloaks. Cloaks might possibly ruin the game more than all these impossible to kill 1400 eHP Proto sentinels. I can see fatties being UP x10, but in limited numbers they can work. Problem is there will be 8-10 per battles, which won't work.
Cotsy8 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 86	Posted - 2014.03.25 19:10:00 - [2] - Quote Dexter307 wrote: Cotsy8 wrote: poison Diego wrote: This here is a whole new game. When people who dont have gungame just activate cloak in a middle of 1vs1? thats just sad... Cloak was never needed and does not fit any role in dust(maybe NK assassins) I am a scout and Im telling you that I DONT NEED CLOAK!!! EDIT: btw there will be no new-comers now... FIX IT SCOUTS DO NOT NEED A CLOAK - 100% agree Cloaks are stupid, no reason to have them in game. They are a negative, not a positive. Get rid of cloaks. Cloaks might possibly ruin the game more than all these impossible to kill 1400 eHP Proto sentinels. I can see fatties being UP x10, but in limited numbers they can work. Problem is there will be 8-10 per battles, which won't work. Only people who will complain about cloaks are bad players Keep that in mind Quiet the opposite, its scrubs who need to use cloaks. What a joke cloaks are, there's no reason to need them, just unskilled ***** scouts complaining their eHP too low because they don't bother to flank or learn tactics. Now scouts don't need to flank or bother playing a stealth role. Fit a cloak, head to frontline, then it on and stand still and wait. That's not a tactic, thats a joke Scouts who need a cloak to be competitive or viable, should love cloaks because they are terrible players. Scouts don't need a cloak to be good, you just need more skill and experience (and apparently SP in dust). Cloaks are a crutch that middle of the road to bad players need to use a scout, while it'll just help the lesser skilled elite... And the scouts who know how to play (and dominated prior to 1.8) will continue too but not cause of the cloak. Get rid of the crutch, scouts don't need it and anyone who thinks they do can go to another class.
Cotsy8 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 86	Posted - 2014.03.25 19:11:00 - [3] - Quote Horizen Kenpachi wrote: Qq already play something else QQ isn't about how good or bad cloaks are, it's they shouldn't be in game. No reason for it.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.