DUST Search - Do passive scans light up reds for your squad/team?

All Channels

General Discussions

Do passive scans light up reds for your squad/team?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 337	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:08:00 - [1] - Quote I know absolutely nothing about this, because I haven't touched scouts yet except on my very bad alt character. If they do... then yeah active scanners are worthless now... but if they don't I'm not so sure. At least an active scanner will light up the heavies and most mediums. I laugh at your CR, HMG, SMG, LR, ScR, AR, ScP & IoP
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 971	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:09:00 - [2] - Quote No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Best PVE idea I've seen. Fixed link.
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 356	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:14:00 - [3] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides.
boba's fetta Dead Man's Game 408	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:14:00 - [4] - Quote had been wondering this myself. i want proxie chat so i can run around in the gall heavy saying GET IN MAH BELLY. nah just kidding trade window please=)
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 337	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:17:00 - [5] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. In that case I really don't see why everyone is whining about active scanners. Gal Logi will still have the most armor of the logis. The proto scanner may not be able to pick up a fully dampened scout but seriously? Why would that NOT be useful for orbitals anymore? Just because it's not going to be OP anymore doesn't mean it won't be needed. I laugh at your CR, HMG, SMG, LR, ScR, AR, ScP & IoP
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 337	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:18:00 - [6] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. Wait. Really? In that case screw the Gal Logi... I laugh at your CR, HMG, SMG, LR, ScR, AR, ScP & IoP
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 359	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:22:00 - [7] - Quote bamboo x wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. In that case I really don't see why everyone is whining about active scanners. Gal Logi will still have the most armor of the logis. The proto scanner may not be able to pick up a fully dampened scout but seriously? Why would that NOT be useful for orbitals anymore? Just because it's not going to be OP anymore doesn't mean it won't be needed. They whined about scannerinas who could perma scan everything within 100m and had great tank and insane dps. Cal scouts wil be pretty bullshit but they'll also be vulnerable.
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 971	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:23:00 - [8] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. I stand corrected. Best PVE idea I've seen. Fixed link.
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 341	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:26:00 - [9] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: bamboo x wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. In that case I really don't see why everyone is whining about active scanners. Gal Logi will still have the most armor of the logis. The proto scanner may not be able to pick up a fully dampened scout but seriously? Why would that NOT be useful for orbitals anymore? Just because it's not going to be OP anymore doesn't mean it won't be needed. They whined about scannerinas who could perma scan everything within 100m and had great tank and insane dps. Cal scouts wil be pretty bullshit but they'll also be vulnerable. No I mean everyone in my corp is whining about active scanners being nerfed. Yeah you're right, Gal Logi will probably outperform the Cal scout in killzone situations. Another thing about scans is that vehicles haven't been announced to be changing. I laugh at your CR, HMG, SMG, LR, ScR, AR, ScP & IoP
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 359	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:31:00 - [10] - Quote bamboo x wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: bamboo x wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. In that case I really don't see why everyone is whining about active scanners. Gal Logi will still have the most armor of the logis. The proto scanner may not be able to pick up a fully dampened scout but seriously? Why would that NOT be useful for orbitals anymore? Just because it's not going to be OP anymore doesn't mean it won't be needed. They whined about scannerinas who could perma scan everything within 100m and had great tank and insane dps. Cal scouts wil be pretty bullshit but they'll also be vulnerable. No I mean everyone in my corp is whining about active scanners being nerfed. Yeah you're right, Gal Logi will probably outperform the Cal scout in killzone situations. Another thing about scans is that vehicles haven't been announced to be changing. Mix a cal scout into your squads with 2x precision amps, and 2x range extenders, you will pick up cloaked scouts that don't have multiple complex damps, at 70~ meters

low genius The Sound Of Freedom Dirt Nap Squad. 1383	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:46:00 - [11] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. first right answer in the thread +1
low genius The Sound Of Freedom Dirt Nap Squad. 1383	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:49:00 - [12] - Quote bamboo x wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. Wait. Really? In that case screw the Gal Logi... caldari and gallente will be hard-counters to one another in philosophy. the active scanner on a gall scout will be great, but will be outdone (in short range) by the caldari-scout god-hud. don't forget there are 200m scanners now... just like the old days
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 4598	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:58:00 - [13] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. You sure about this? Because while I haven't tested in a while, I know in the early days of Uprising there was no form of squad sight at all. If this has changed, I'm now wondering when it happened, because it definitely wasn't listed in the patch notes.
Middas Betancore Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 18	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:06:00 - [14] - Quote Mina speaks truth, I am also in that same squad a lot and yes u do share passive scanning data, it is awesome, mainly as the enemy doesn't know they are being constantly lit and relayed among 6 people, not straight away at least Middas Betancore- Caldari FW Tactical Liason
Reav Hannari Red Rock Outriders 3453	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:10:00 - [15] - Quote Is this thread a coordinated troll? Adapt or Die // Republic Lance Commander // @ReesNoturana
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 366	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:11:00 - [16] - Quote Garrett Blacknova wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates - I've been playing with a proto gal scout friend who runs 2x cplx range amps for about 2 months, and I've also brought this guy along to fw matches where other squad members have decided they love him for the added safety his huge scan radius provides. You sure about this? Because while I haven't tested in a while, I know in the early days of Uprising there was no form of squad sight at all. If this has changed, I'm now wondering when it happened, because it definitely wasn't listed in the patch notes. 100% positive.
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 366	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:12:00 - [17] - Quote Reav Hannari wrote: Is this thread a coordinated troll? It's fairly easy to test.
Middas Betancore Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 19	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:12:00 - [18] - Quote No, but a troll would say that, wouldn't he?guess you can find out for yourself in a while Middas Betancore- Caldari FW Tactical Liason
stlcarlos989 SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance 1255	Posted - 2014.03.25 11:16:00 - [19] - Quote I can confirm in 1.7 passive scans are shared by the squad, its hard to notice unless you have some with a gallente scout with range 5 and range enhancers on. My corpmate Judas Iscariot666 ran that fit (3 complex range amps) in an ambush to test it I took off my scanner and he ran towards the enemy I made sure to face the opposite direction and sure enough my radar light up like a Christmas tree. Not sure if its changing in 1.8 but the same fit will have more range. STB Director, #1 in Warpoints E3 Closed Beta Build, Water Pipe Aficionado, Cannabis Sativa Connoisseur


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.