DUST Search - Just Nuked An HAV

All Channels

General Discussions

Just Nuked An HAV

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5979	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:05:00 - [1] - Quote Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance 2192	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:07:00 - [2] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? keep trying, you'll notice after you fail to kill one the flaw in the missile plan
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5979	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:09:00 - [3] - Quote calisk galern wrote: keep trying, you'll notice after you fail to kill one the flaw in the missile plan Well, the only time I've failed is against a hardened shield HAV or when my missiles missed. But usually they have so little HP left that they retreat instead of fighting, buying me some time to reload. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 3594	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:09:00 - [4] - Quote The only reason I play Cal FW. No.
Ansiiis The Trustworthy Mocking Bird Inc. 895	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:16:00 - [5] - Quote You're in trouble if you're facing good players with nitros - they will shoot you calmly until it is about time you reload, then they activate nitros and ram you or driver around like an asian woman. Want PVE? Wonder why? New picture every day.
Tebu Gan Dem Durrty Boyz 674	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:22:00 - [6] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Trust me, they aren't as great as you think. Sure they can murder some maddies, but beyond that they aren't that great. Tanks - Balancing Turrets
Lorhak Gannarsein Science For Death 2238	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:24:00 - [7] - Quote In pubs they're quite effective. Otherwise they're appallingly bad. Anything, and I mean anything that missiles can do, a railgun can do better. ak.0 4 LYFE Large Missile Turrets: the real unicorns of DUST.
Vulpes Dolosus SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance 1082	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:28:00 - [8] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: In pubs they're quite effective. Otherwise they're appallingly bad. Anything, and I mean anything that missiles can do, a railgun can do better. This is the sad truth. Which is why I want an EM missile variant. They'll tear apart Gunnlogi rail tanks up close (and only up close) and be they're only real counter (besides another rail tank). Me in my ADS: 1,2
Arx Ardashir Imperium Aeternum 684	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:46:00 - [9] - Quote Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: In pubs they're quite effective. Otherwise they're appallingly bad. Anything, and I mean anything that missiles can do, a railgun can do better. This is the sad truth. Which is why I want an EM missile variant. They'll tear apart Gunnlogi rail tanks up close (and only up close) and be they're only real counter (besides another rail tank). Well hopefully the might of amarrian vehicle weaponry isn't too far off. And as to the OP, I remember popping my first armor HAV with missiles and then thinking they were the best thing ever. But I've had them be very ineffective against shields, both hardened and unhardened. I could be doing it wrong though, I suppose. Now is the winter of our non-content. Ghosts Chance's hero for 3/1/14. A manu dei et tet rimon.
Leonid Tybalt Heaven's-Gate 324	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:49:00 - [10] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? I've known about it for a long time It's other difficult to get through shield hardeners though. But if you focus on manouevering your tank and making sure you get the drop on other tanks, they won't even have time to react to your 12 missile barrage of doom that does the damage of a railgun shot several times over.

GeneralButtNaked Fatal Absolution 782	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:52:00 - [11] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Real AV doesn't stop until all the tanks are dead.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5979	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:56:00 - [12] - Quote GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Skihids Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 3096	Posted - 2014.03.21 17:57:00 - [13] - Quote Arx Ardashir wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: In pubs they're quite effective. Otherwise they're appallingly bad. Anything, and I mean anything that missiles can do, a railgun can do better. This is the sad truth. Which is why I want an EM missile variant. They'll tear apart Gunnlogi rail tanks up close (and only up close) and be they're only real counter (besides another rail tank). Well hopefully the might of amarrian vehicle weaponry isn't too far off. And as to the OP, I remember popping my first armor HAV with missiles and then thinking they were the best thing ever. But I've had them be very ineffective against shields, both hardened and unhardened. I could be doing it wrong though, I suppose. If you thought blasters were too good against infantry just wait for the large laser turrets. Anything that can cut through HAV shields is going to vaporize dropsuits like a magnifying glass melting ants. Give me a dropship with three small laser turrtes. Can you say "Martian War Machine"?
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1345	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:03:00 - [14] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because you were a scrub. And you still are. You're probably the only person in a missile tank that I won't give respect "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
GeneralButtNaked Fatal Absolution 782	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:04:00 - [15] - Quote Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" Someone who knows why missiles are trash through experience. Real AV doesn't stop until all the tanks are dead.
Kigurosaka Laaksonen DUST University Ivy League 698	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:11:00 - [16] - Quote Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: In pubs they're quite effective. Otherwise they're appallingly bad. Anything, and I mean anything that missiles can do, a railgun can do better. This is the sad truth. Which is why I want an EM missile variant. They'll tear apart Gunnlogi rail tanks up close (and only up close) and be they're only real counter (besides another rail tank). EM ammo types would be possible if DUST did weapon and damage types like EVE. Right now we have Laser, Hybrid - Plasma, Hybrid - Rail, Projectile and Explosive weapon types that have set damage modifiers against shields and armor. We need Energy, Hybrid, Projectile, and Missile weapon types. They need to do some combination of EM, Thermal, Kinetic, and Explosive damage types. DUST 514 Recruit Code - https://dust514.com/recruit/zluCyb/ EVE Buddy Invite - Too damn long. Ask me for it.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5979	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:12:00 - [17] - Quote GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" Someone who knows why missiles are trash through experience. So basically I'm almost a real tanker? You'd think piloting since 1.2 would make me one huh? AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
GeneralButtNaked Fatal Absolution 782	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:33:00 - [18] - Quote Atiim wrote: So basically I'm almost a real tanker? You'd think piloting since 1.2 would make me one huh? Since you didn't know about resists, you were not tanking before 1.6. Every post you made to attempt that claim was completely invalidated when you showed your ignorance regarding fits. You did not tank, and you certainly can't tank, otherwise you would be doing it in PC right now, where tankers are in high demand, people who can call a tank are just fodder. You think you are a tanker? Get in touch with AE, or NS, or ERA. They need you. Then we will see if you are a tanker. Real AV doesn't stop until all the tanks are dead.
Leonid Tybalt Heaven's-Gate 326	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:45:00 - [19] - Quote GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Haha! A lot of "real" tankers I've crushed with missiles probably thought they were garbage too. Oh, and before you come whining about who's a real tanker and not: I've got 14 million sp into large vehicle turrets and vehicle upgrades. What do you have?
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 525	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:55:00 - [20] - Quote Leonid Tybalt wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Haha! A lot of "real" tankers I've crushed with missiles probably thought they were garbage too. Oh, and before you come whining about who's a real tanker and not: I've got 14 million sp into large vehicle turrets and vehicle upgrades. What do you have? I wouldn't call them garbage, but they do fall short compared to the other turrets. Rails are all around better at AV and Blasters are better at AI. It doesn't help that they have some stupid mechanics either. Terrible reload system Full auto fire doesn't work when aiming at something "shootable" Drop off damage(makes no goddamn sense) Range is bad, 250m They absolutely blow against shields I swear the splash damage and radius is bugged or something Don't get me wrong, I love my XT-201 Gunnlogi and I run it all the time, but Missiles just aren't as good as the other turrets, they're too situational. *FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!*

Foundation Seldon Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 599	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:56:00 - [21] - Quote Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because Rails are still better overall and will remain so until such time as they are nerfed. It's a 600m Shotgun that works against anything called on the field vs. a weapon type that both needs a lot of SP to spec into and is only super effective against Armor Tanks and low flying Dropships. Saga v. Methana Balance
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1939	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:57:00 - [22] - Quote Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" Meaning "not you" I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5979	Posted - 2014.03.21 18:58:00 - [23] - Quote GeneralButtNaked wrote: Since you didn't know about resists, you were not tanking before 1.6. Every post you made to attempt that claim was completely invalidated when you showed your ignorance regarding fits. [citation needed] lolKen in not a citation btw. Don't believe everything you hear. GeneralButtNaked wrote: You did not tank, and you certainly can't tank, otherwise you would be doing it in PC right now, where tankers are in high demand, people who can call a tank are just fodder. You think you are a tanker? Get in touch with AE, or NS, or ERA. They need you. Then we will see if you are a tanker. Why would I want to get in touch with them? Most of them are elitist $#!tposters and jack@sses. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5980	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:04:00 - [24] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because you were a scrub. And you still are. You're probably the only person in a missile tank that I won't give respect Gaining respect from a tanker is like getting HIV from a prostitute. AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Foundation Seldon Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 600	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:06:00 - [25] - Quote In this thread : "Real Forum Warriors" ignore everything and ** post because Atiim is the topic creator. They then proceed to shamelessly whip out their e-*' and on the floor in order to establish dominance among the forum pack. Watch closely as they arbitrarily create restrictions about who is and isn't a "real tanker" despite ignoring the obvious qualifier of "a person who uses tanks". Truly fascinating, though we're unlikely to see the ever elusive mating ritual one assumes it involves sucking eachother's hate boners and ***** themselves. Saga v. Methana Balance
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 5980	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:11:00 - [26] - Quote Foundation Seldon wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because Rails are still better overall and will remain so until such time as they are nerfed. It's a 600m Shotgun that works against anything called on the field vs. a weapon type that both needs a lot of SP to spec into and is only super effective against Armor Tanks and low flying Dropships. Assuming you run with damage mods, the TTK with missiles is a bit shorter. Though they are a bit situational, but at least the LP cost on the XTs aren't as ridiculous as the cost on Particle Cannons AV > HAV > INF > AV \| Not: HAV > AV GëÑ INF [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 528	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:19:00 - [27] - Quote Foundation Seldon wrote: In this thread : "Real Forum Warriors" ignore everything and ** post because Atiim is the topic creator. They then proceed to shamelessly whip out their e-*' and on the floor in order to establish dominance among the forum pack. Watch closely as they arbitrarily create restrictions about who is and isn't a "real tanker" despite ignoring the obvious qualifier of "a person who uses tanks". Truly fascinating, though we're unlikely to see the ever elusive mating ritual one assumes it involves sucking eachother's hate boners and *** themselves. Oh man, seriously. Some people take what defines someone as a "true ____" way too seriously. "Oh, sorry, but you only started tanking in 1.whogivesafuck, my entire ancestry has a long history of tankers dating back to primordial times, so therefore you're not a real tanker, you're just scrub poseur noob." FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!**
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1939	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:21:00 - [28] - Quote Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" Someone who knows why missiles are trash through experience. So basically I'm almost a real tanker? You'd think piloting since 1.2 would make me one huh? You're not even almost a real tanker. You're a never was, because you're still on a crusade against tanks. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1939	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:22:00 - [29] - Quote GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: So basically I'm almost a real tanker? You'd think piloting since 1.2 would make me one huh? Since you didn't know about resists, you were not tanking before 1.6. Every post you made to attempt that claim was completely invalidated when you showed your ignorance regarding fits. You did not tank, and you certainly can't tank, otherwise you would be doing it in PC right now, where tankers are in high demand, people who can call a tank are just fodder. You think you are a tanker? Get in touch with AE, or NS, or ERA. They need you. Then we will see if you are a tanker. AE? lol I tried tanking for them. The other team had 6 rail tanks. There's only so much Taka and I can do against 6 scrubs. Tanks are basically useless anyway, because they counter each other, thus nullifying themselves. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1939	Posted - 2014.03.21 19:23:00 - [30] - Quote Leonid Tybalt wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Haha! A lot of "real" tankers I've crushed with missiles probably thought they were garbage too. Oh, and before you come whining about who's a real tanker and not: I've got 14 million sp into large vehicle turrets and vehicle upgrades. What do you have? Lol you've been saving SP for that long? And who might you be? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.