DUST Search - lolcpm - Not representing the community since it began

All Channels

General Discussions

lolcpm - Not representing the community since it began

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 985	Posted - 2014.03.12 16:32:00 - [1] - Quote CPM can only strongly request things. They can't twist CCP's arm. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 985	Posted - 2014.03.12 16:35:00 - [2] - Quote Sam Tektzby wrote: Nope just read new DEV blog. Its stuff really just for strong stomach. I did read the new dev blog. Dropsuit Devblog wrote: After lengthy discussions with the CPM and large amounts of community feedback, the decision has been made to refund all skill points currently spent in the Dropsuit Command tree to playersGÇÖ unallocated SP pools. It doesn't say CPM didn't push for a full infatry refund. Does it? "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1053	Posted - 2014.03.14 01:26:00 - [3] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Crap missed a crud tonn of things including public face time, CPM / CSM joint sessions, Internal Debates, CPM1 Fostering and Nurturing, After Meetings, Follow Up Meetings, Follow Up, 'Homework', Bro / Vent Talks, and Game Sessions, and no; no timestamps as I kept most of those off records. But based on portional amounts of the activity I say counts nearly 50% of the other cpm activity give or take. Does not include forum, face time ingame, ingame meets, pod casts, video interviews, AMAs (last ama I was part of was 22 man hours) Skype chats with players, and IRC time. I know CPM spends hundreds of hours working for us, so don't take this the wrong way... I am just playing devil's advocate... If you have spent so much time preaching to CCP about the respec why aren't we being given a full infantry respec? "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1054	Posted - 2014.03.14 12:01:00 - [4] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I can't give you the whole reason, not yet, which is also the big reason and main reason why. NDA's are a sonofabitch... Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I will divulge a minor factor though. Look at the previous respecs / refunds and how often those cause more problems than they fixed. As a reminder this was a small factor in the overall discussion. What problems did it cause? I mean, I know many vehicle pilots were grateful for the SP refund. I also know we don't see all of the beautiful data CCP sees... did the last SP refund cause a hamster rebellion or something? "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1058	Posted - 2014.03.14 13:52:00 - [5] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The one before that had more publicly seen problems. Was that the respec that players had to opt-in to by opening a support ticket? "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1062	Posted - 2014.03.14 14:57:00 - [6] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: and the people who accidentally got millions of more isk as well. Was not aware of that part... okay so respecs can cause some collateral damage then. Oh, and Sam Tektzby keeps going on and on about you saying there will never be a weapon respec. Did you ever say that? "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1070	Posted - 2014.03.14 15:49:00 - [7] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: snip I guess I am just a bit bitter... I had nearly maxed AR because it was what was on my starter fit. Now I am wiser and each race has it's own rifle finally. I fully plan on never using that AR again, but I'm stuck with the AR simply because CCP hadn't released the RR yet. Essentially, 1.5 - 2mil SP from my lifetime SP total is wasted. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1082	Posted - 2014.03.14 18:38:00 - [8] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: and there may come a time your new favorite weapon may get nerfed, or may get over nerfed into oblivion. I'd take a break from Dust until CCP fixed it or I'd use another Caldari weapon until then. Just anything but the AR. If I could have CCP delete those SP from my skill tree I would ask them to do it. I feel the refund it necessary, but if they could at least delete the SP I'd be satisfied. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 1082	Posted - 2014.03.14 18:44:00 - [9] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Inversely there is always a chance they can buff something. If CCP made 2,500RPM AR's shoot Minmatar/Gallente-seeking bullets with a 10m splash radius, 200m optimal range, and 0.5 reload speed I still would not use them. I'm not sure I am making it just how clear I don't want to use the AR. If CCP offered me an omega booster every time I fit an AR and killed someone with it, I would turn them down. "I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.