Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dr PepperPoP
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
275
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 20:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
I'm just given ya a hard time.
No one is happy that PC is what it is. Half of us expected Skirm 1.0 to return when PC dropped.
But todays grind is tomorrows leisure. |
Knight Soiaire
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
5063
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 20:47:00 -
[32] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:
Who is a heavy ? Me ?
Sorry now my English is getting the worst of me !
Nah, this Dr Pepper dude, whoever he is! I mean, Dr Pepper isn't even a nice drink!
ISK Milkshakes for all (Except the Pubbies)
|
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
388
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 20:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:
Who is a heavy ? Me ?
Sorry now my English is getting the worst of me !
Nah, this Dr Pepper dude, whoever he is! I mean, Dr Pepper isn't even a nice drink!
Oh
Was worried
This event made me run heavy 2-3 matches then I faced you and got insta poped buy your OP as a coplule of times. Deleted my dren heavy after that realising I hate the fatty suit.
I forgot to thank you for that lesson =˙Ĩ
War never changes
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
534
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 21:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Go Crimea a river.
I like puns
1.8 must be a porn star because it is taking a long time to come.
|
Roy Ventus
Axis of Chaos
1292
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 21:49:00 -
[35] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks.
I've been here long enough to know you're full of it...
You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even an arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't).
The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2446
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 21:57:00 -
[36] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:
Who be a heavy ? Me ?
Sorry now my mad skillz is getting the worst of me !
Nah, this Dr Pepper homie, whoever he be! I be tellin, Dr Pepper ain't even a nice drink! fo sho Do I be doin this right?
Listen
10M ISK and you shall not be annoyed otherwise just ignore me.
|
Patrick57
5901
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 22:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
CYRAX SERVIUS wrote:Grabbing popcorn,
Again... I actually had to take a break and go to the store to buy more popcorn. :( |
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
391
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 23:14:00 -
[38] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks. I've been here long enough to know you're full of it... You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't). The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high.
Where did I post that " opening PC to smaller corps ?" Dude my English is not the best but stop posting that I have written stuff that I clearly haven't !
Again
I want PC to be bigger/grander I want PC to have more players in it I want PC to be longer I want PC not to be a mirror of skirm I don't want 15 out of 16 players to be ringers I want the timers removed
Now you might not agree on al or some and that's perfectly okey. If this is me being full of it so be it.
However I am saying this knowingly that there is contradictions in dose statements but to bandy ides around starts buy puting contradictions against one and other. If I do this what comes out and is it worth it ?
Discussions should be long and difficult, and many thouts will be bandied about ( and out ). But then to bandy ides with a witless worm as your self is pointless since you don't know anything about that art.
You just slander and take it personal.
Again I hear and respect what you are saying but I TOTALY and utterly disagree on it
Regards
Edit : yeah I hate PC in its current form
War never changes
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2450
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 00:41:00 -
[39] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks. I've been here long enough to know you're full of it... You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't). The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high. Where did I post that " opening PC to smaller corps ?" Dude my English is not the best but stop posting that I have written stuff that I clearly haven't ! Again I want PC to be bigger/grander Agreed I want PC to have more players in it Agreed I want PC to be longer Agreed I want PC not to be a mirror of skirm Agreed, I'd like a rush like gamemode I don't want 15 out of 16 players to be ringers Disagree, Never going to happen, bad players will always hire ringers I want the timers removed Disagree, Might happen but will kill small corps and increase ringer use... Now you might not agree on al or some and that's perfectly okey. If this is me being full of it so be it. However I am saying this knowingly that there is contradictions in dose statements but to bandy ides around starts buy puting contradictions against one and other. If I do this what comes out and is it worth it ? Discussions should be long and difficult, and many thouts will be bandied about ( and out ). But then to bandy ides with a witless worm as your self is pointless since you don't know anything about that art. You just slander and take it personal. Again I hear and respect what you are saying but I TOTALY and utterly disagree on it Regards Edit : yeah I hate PC in its current form PC getting bigger = More Ringers
Listen
10M ISK and you shall not be annoyed otherwise just ignore me.
|
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
391
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 08:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Killer-12
Cool
If they make PC bigger then maybee or quite posibull the ringer " problem " ( in the lack of a better word) will go away.
War never changes
|
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2452
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 12:19:00 -
[41] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Killer-12
Cool
If they make PC bigger then maybe or quite possible the ringer " problem " ( in the lack of a better word) will go away.
If Beers could reply here he's the "expert" (He's smart but controversial and hated by many) but expanding PC would be nice, the thing with ringers is that they can A) Attract a corp's talent B) Demoralize a corp C) Flip districts efficiently But lets figure that fights are 32v32 then guess what you'll see 31 Imps/TP/FA/Indy Ringer team of Doom(being formed soon tm) come bearing down on you on your redline/cloning you in 1 attack... OR if you're envisioning an open world then... yeah this is CCP ffs
Also switch to Firefox or Chrome you get these fancy squiggly lines like in word.
Listen
10M ISK and you shall not be annoyed otherwise just ignore me.
|
Roy Ventus
Axis of Chaos
1300
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 14:32:00 -
[42] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks. I've been here long enough to know you're full of it... You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't). The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high. Where did I post that " opening PC to smaller corps ?" Dude my English is not the best but stop posting that I have written stuff that I clearly haven't ! Again I want PC to be bigger/grander I want PC to have more players in it I want PC to be longer I want PC not to be a mirror of skirm I don't want 15 out of 16 players to be ringers I want the timers removed Now you might not agree on al or some and that's perfectly okey. If this is me being full of it so be it. However I am saying this knowingly that there is contradictions in dose statements but to bandy ides around starts buy puting contradictions against one and other. If I do this what comes out and is it worth it ? Discussions should be long and difficult, and many thouts will be bandied about ( and out ). But then to bandy ides with a witless worm as your self is pointless since you don't know anything about that art. You just slander and take it personal. Again I hear and respect what you are saying but I TOTALY and utterly disagree on it Regards Edit : yeah I hate PC in its current form
Earlier on you were talking about how it was closed off and static. I take it personal because despite the respect you keep claiming to give, you're still being hostile and essentially calling me a know it all, when I'm perfectly fine with listening to an argument. Remember, "F U I can have my own opinion," hmm?
And no you shouldn't put contradictions together like so because it leads to weak arguments. You want less ringing but want a harder PC with an extended time, team limit, and no timers. Those three things will make PC get locked up by even less people than it's locked by now or amplify the need for ringers. If you release these limits for just Null-Sec it would be fine but you're talking about all of PC.
And besides all of the contradictions the updates for PC will come later. Bigger maps and all of that. You don't have to state your dislike of not having it right now because it's useless.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3057
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 15:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
Piraten Hovnoret
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
393
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 18:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks. I've been here long enough to know you're full of it... You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't). The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high. Where did I post that " opening PC to smaller corps ?" Dude my English is not the best but stop posting that I have written stuff that I clearly haven't ! Again I want PC to be bigger/grander I want PC to have more players in it I want PC to be longer I want PC not to be a mirror of skirm I don't want 15 out of 16 players to be ringers I want the timers removed Now you might not agree on al or some and that's perfectly okey. If this is me being full of it so be it. However I am saying this knowingly that there is contradictions in dose statements but to bandy ides around starts buy puting contradictions against one and other. If I do this what comes out and is it worth it ? Discussions should be long and difficult, and many thouts will be bandied about ( and out ). But then to bandy ides with a witless worm as your self is pointless since you don't know anything about that art. You just slander and take it personal. Again I hear and respect what you are saying but I TOTALY and utterly disagree on it Regards Edit : yeah I hate PC in its current form Earlier on you were talking about how it was closed off and static. I take it personal because despite the respect you keep claiming to give, you're still being hostile and essentially calling me a know it all, when I'm perfectly fine with listening to an argument. Remember, "F U I can have my own opinion," hmm? And no you shouldn't put contradictions together like so because it leads to weak arguments. You want less ringing but want a harder PC with an extended time, team limit, and no timers. Those three things will make PC get locked up by even less people than it's locked by now or amplify the need for ringers. If you release these limits for just Null-Sec it would be fine but you're talking about all of PC. And besides all of the contradictions the updates for PC will come later. Bigger maps and all of that. You don't have to state your dislike of not having it right now because it's useless.
Roy you are a pice of work. Before you got a FU you wrote " stop QQing about ringers" and "you are butthurt" Makes me wounder it you are the one who is butthurt. If your realy want a more polite and nice reply maybee you shoud think about what manner your own replyes are written.
My original post was not intended as a personal insult to you. But your first reply was al personal and insulting. Basicly you got in a STFU I DONT LIKE YOUR POST MODE and I returned it on the the same manner bud.
I am done with you sorry escuse of a human being. You may type whatever you want in whatever slandering way you are just not worth the time and effort any more.
Regards
War never changes
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1149
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 12:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dr PepperPoP wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Dr PepperPoP wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:
Where the fuvk do I state that I haven't been in PC ? My English is not the best but I am pretty shore I did not post that somewhere!
You didn't have too. I saw your tag and knew. Lol Makes me wonder if you have been in PC, since you apparently believe it's a peach in there! But hey I guess some are happy with it as it is. I don't Me? I've never stepped foot inside a PC match. I'm just another nobody hiding behind an alt trolling people. But what I say is still true - you haven't seen more then 5-10 PC matches. So your comments are misplaced, misleading, and miss-conginality was a great movie. Sandra Bullock, so fkn hot!!!
CEO
Whiskey squad leader
Invictus Maneo~"I Remain Unvanquished"~
|
Gildart Lightray
Eternal Beings Proficiency V.
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 17:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:I just realised I fu+ēking hate PC This Tuesday it will be the same old same old.
The current locking of districts are showing that the hole gamemode is broke.
Timers ? Wy the f++ck do we have timers? What's the logic behind them? It's like Ukraine would have timers on Krim and saying to the Russians you can only invade at 13:00. WTF you hold a district you better be prepared to defend it 24/7
And wy the F are PC a mirror of skirm ? It should be so MORE. Bigger maps, more players, LONGER battles.
PC is just crap as it is now
Timers? Because it's a ducking VIDEO GAME and being prepared 24/7 ? Okay , then PC would be dominated by one corp because all the dudes that can wake up in the middle of the goddamn night or leave their own wedding would all form a super corp where all the people that have lives wouldn't be able to compete. There. Is. Nothing. Wrong. With. The. Mechanic. It's the people that actually ducking break it. Sure there is exploits which many things in the world has to. There's always a loop. Also , even with this super corp it would be difficult to hold more than 2-3 districts making PC pointless because of no Isk which is why most people do it and not to kill people in an organized match which shouldn't have any blueberries.
People are broken, not the game(well...it's sort of broken but the community just abuses it even more)
Please note that this is totally all IMO. I see your points and understand your frustrations but don't agree. Which you don't agree with mine.
Forum Warrior lvl. 0
This scrub is for hire
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3077
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 17:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Gildart Lightray wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:I just realised I fu+ēking hate PC This Tuesday it will be the same old same old.
The current locking of districts are showing that the hole gamemode is broke.
Timers ? Wy the f++ck do we have timers? What's the logic behind them? It's like Ukraine would have timers on Krim and saying to the Russians you can only invade at 13:00. WTF you hold a district you better be prepared to defend it 24/7
And wy the F are PC a mirror of skirm ? It should be so MORE. Bigger maps, more players, LONGER battles.
PC is just crap as it is now
Timers? Because it's a ducking VIDEO GAME and being prepared 24/7 ? Okay , then PC would be dominated by one corp because all the dudes that can wake up in the middle of the goddamn night or leave their own wedding would all form a super corp where all the people that have lives wouldn't be able to compete. There. Is. Nothing. Wrong. With. The. Mechanic. It's the people that actually ducking break it. Sure there is exploits which many things in the world has to. There's always a loop. Also , even with this super corp it would be difficult to hold more than 2-3 districts making PC pointless because of no Isk which is why most people do it and not to kill people in an organized match which shouldn't have any blueberries. People are broken, not the game(well...it's sort of broken but the community just abuses it even more) Please note that this is totally all IMO. I see your points and understand your frustrations but don't agree. Which you don't agree with mine.
The timers shouldn't go away, they just need to be changed to window timers. 8-12 hours of downtime per district, you set the window.
This creates a fluid situation in PC.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
529
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 17:50:00 -
[48] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
30 mins to 1 hour is not enough notice for a corp to be ready for a pc, ML can get ringers that fast?
The new CEO of FA
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3077
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
30 mins to 1 hour is not enough notice for a corp to be ready for a pc, ML can get ringers that fast?
I think it opens up the opportunity for more people to participate in PC. You wouldn't be able to rely on ringers all the time because of the short notice.
I think it would increase participation in PC by 4 or 5x.
You'd just have to roll with who is online.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
Mr Machine Guns
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
531
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
30 mins to 1 hour is not enough notice for a corp to be ready for a pc, ML can get ringers that fast? I think it opens up the opportunity for more people to participate in PC. You wouldn't be able to rely on ringers all the time because of the short notice. I think it would increase participation in PC by 4 or 5x. You'd just have to roll with who is online.
maybe increase window for attack to 2 to 3 hours but still keep notification time the same
The new CEO of FA
|
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3077
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 19:25:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
30 mins to 1 hour is not enough notice for a corp to be ready for a pc, ML can get ringers that fast? I think it opens up the opportunity for more people to participate in PC. You wouldn't be able to rely on ringers all the time because of the short notice. I think it would increase participation in PC by 4 or 5x. You'd just have to roll with who is online. maybe increase window for attack to 2 to 3 hours but still keep notification time the same
I'm thinking about being able to attack and participate in that battle in that sitting. Perhaps multiple battles.
I'm also thinking about how the established corps as they stand would be unable to hold all of MH with a mechanic such as the one I'm proposing. Thus opening up PC to more corps and more players within those corps. AND it would be more fluid, which seems like it would be more fun.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
Gildart Lightray
Eternal Beings Proficiency V.
94
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 19:49:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Mr Machine Guns wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Timers that allow for battles to spin up faster would help more corps get into PC and it would break up some of the gridlock created by small, elite teams that benefit from the 24-48 hour timers.
I've proposed window timers that allow for some downtime, but provide a window that the district can be attacked every day. With battles spinning up in 30min-1 hour after an attack.
30 mins to 1 hour is not enough notice for a corp to be ready for a pc, ML can get ringers that fast? I think it opens up the opportunity for more people to participate in PC. You wouldn't be able to rely on ringers all the time because of the short notice. I think it would increase participation in PC by 4 or 5x. You'd just have to roll with who is online. maybe increase window for attack to 2 to 3 hours but still keep notification time the same I'm thinking about being able to attack and participate in that battle in that sitting. Perhaps multiple battles. I'm also thinking about how the established corps as they stand would be unable to hold all of MH with a mechanic such as the one I'm proposing. Thus opening up PC to more corps and more players within those corps. AND it would be more fluid, which seems like it would be more fun.
There's another problem as well. Experience. Even if PC reached this mythical stage of 'open' to all then most of these corp trying it would get crushed regardless. I was in a match against TP(MHPD) for a allied corp called Hostile Acquisitions Inc. I was merely a guest(ringer) and their planning? None. They had no idea how to properly "PC". It was bad...like...really bad. And they weren't taking it seriously to begin with so whatever.
These corps wanting "land" need to practice. Hit up a big corp with all these district locking bullshit and ask then to practice in one of the many lolLocking matches. Or these smaller corps could just build up money and forget about trying to take land and just enjoy good old organized battles.
Forum Warrior lvl. 0
This scrub is for hire
|
Roy Ventus
Axis of Chaos
1309
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 19:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Roy Ventus wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Not going quote that long reply. Respect for writing that bro
Listen if you are happy with things as they are that fine
It's clear to me after reading your post you have been here too long. You are stuck and have no vision time to steep aside old man.
No I don't agree with your post it's just a long status q post. The game need to change instead of siting on a high horse you can get down and throw a couple of balls and c where they land at the end.
Regards
No one's happy with PC right now...Not even those corps exploiting it. You just gave weird nonsensical reasons why it sucks. I've been here long enough to know you're full of it... You're looking to make the game worse and it's not even arguable. I gave you the reasons why those ideas would make the game worse and how contradictory it is with your ideas of opening up PC to the smaller corps, since they would force small corps to go extinct in PC(as if they already aren't). The pot calling the kettle black here. You're acting like I'm the fool when you don't back up **** and decide to give crap ideas to make for a crap game that would be extremely broken. You get off your high horse and actually realize that you're wrong instead of walking around with your chin up high. Where did I post that " opening PC to smaller corps ?" Dude my English is not the best but stop posting that I have written stuff that I clearly haven't ! Again I want PC to be bigger/grander I want PC to have more players in it I want PC to be longer I want PC not to be a mirror of skirm I don't want 15 out of 16 players to be ringers I want the timers removed Now you might not agree on al or some and that's perfectly okey. If this is me being full of it so be it. However I am saying this knowingly that there is contradictions in dose statements but to bandy ides around starts buy puting contradictions against one and other. If I do this what comes out and is it worth it ? Discussions should be long and difficult, and many thouts will be bandied about ( and out ). But then to bandy ides with a witless worm as your self is pointless since you don't know anything about that art. You just slander and take it personal. Again I hear and respect what you are saying but I TOTALY and utterly disagree on it Regards Edit : yeah I hate PC in its current form Earlier on you were talking about how it was closed off and static. I take it personal because despite the respect you keep claiming to give, you're still being hostile and essentially calling me a know it all, when I'm perfectly fine with listening to an argument. Remember, "F U I can have my own opinion," hmm? And no you shouldn't put contradictions together like so because it leads to weak arguments. You want less ringing but want a harder PC with an extended time, team limit, and no timers. Those three things will make PC get locked up by even less people than it's locked by now or amplify the need for ringers. If you release these limits for just Null-Sec it would be fine but you're talking about all of PC. And besides all of the contradictions the updates for PC will come later. Bigger maps and all of that. You don't have to state your dislike of not having it right now because it's useless. Roy you are a pice of work. Before you got a FU you wrote " stop QQing about ringers" and "you are butthurt" Makes me wounder it you are the one who is butthurt. If your realy want a more polite and nice reply maybee you shoud think about what manner your own replyes are written. My original post was not intended as a personal insult to you. But your first reply was al personal and insulting. Basicly you got in a STFU I DONT LIKE YOUR POST MODE and I returned it on the the same manner bud. Your last post is in the same tone saying my opinions are useless. Makes me wonder who you think you are and in what right you type in that manner? I am done with you sorry escuse of a human being. You may type whatever you want in whatever slandering way you are just not worth the time and effort any more. Regards
+1
"QQ" and "butthurt" are pretty neutral in most circles. Maybe I'm used to most people not giving a damn but I can't imagine those two words being worthy of a **** you response. Sure, sure maybe it was improper to respond to you like that but considering that you started this thread with a bunch of ranting, I thought my post was pretty much "nicer." If you didn't come in here ranting, you wouldn't have gotten treated that way, at least by me. Plenty others do it, and plenty other people get the same type of responses.
Oh. But now you're one for being nice...lol.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3079
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 19:59:00 -
[54] - Quote
To Gildart Lightray:
It's not just about that, there are lots of people within PC corps that have given up on PC because it seems like every match is a who's who of the top 20 Dust Leaderboards.
The ringer situation pushed a lot of people away from PC.
I hate the fact that I can attack someone that we could redline and they have 24-48 hours to find 15 all star ringers. Mechanics that make that less likely will lead to more participation in PC.
I don't think these mechanics will cause 100 25 man corps to join PC, but I do think there are a lot of corps that have been in PC that no longer participate because of all the BS associated with it.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
Level 3 Forum Warrior
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1155
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 20:02:00 -
[55] - Quote
Patrick57 wrote:CYRAX SERVIUS wrote:Grabbing popcorn,
Again... I actually had to take a break and go to the store to buy more popcorn. :( Best thing I ever did was buy a movie style popcorn maker, awesome!!!
I'm trying to sell one to Rampage, have you seen the thread going in the war room? He could be richer than playing PC if he sold popcorn over there!!!
CEO
Whiskey squad leader
Invictus Maneo~"I Remain Unvanquished"~
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
1155
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 20:07:00 -
[56] - Quote
BUUUURRRRRRRRPPPP!!!
Ahhhh, diet coke,
Carry on gentlemen...
CEO
Whiskey squad leader
Invictus Maneo~"I Remain Unvanquished"~
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |