|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
660
   |
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release...
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
661
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release... Not blowing around anymore hot air than tankers did once the AV nerf was announced 
The line you just wrote here basically says that "Tankers were huffing about how underpowered AV would be when the nerf patch notes were released."
I don't think you read through what you wrote there...
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
662
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release... Not blowing around anymore hot air than tankers did once the AV nerf was announced The line you just wrote here basically says that "Tankers were huffing about how underpowered AV would be when the nerf patch notes were released." I don't think you read through what you wrote there... This is why I can't stand when people use idioms.
So you're saying you don't want to be able to set webifier traps? Such a thing would allow tanks to be the prominent force in open areas, but in enclosed areas or nodes, the tanks would be highly vulnerable.
This kind of situational power seems ideal to me.
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
662
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 02:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:I actually like the thought of webifires, and have suggested them myself..
To me it seems that the current vehicles are nicely balanced for Webifier deployment. Standard and Advanced swarm launchers need a bit of extra damage, and possibly 50 more meters for lock-on..
I'd have to say the ideal range for a tank would be between how it used to be where you'd often WTFsplode without time to react a few patches ago, and the relative "low tension" awareness that tanks currently have, and would make both sides of the field a bit more fun to play on.
I do both Tank and AV, so I try to think of either side when I suggest things.
Webifiers would help the field so that the AV ability to engage would toggle with the Tank ability to escape.
After the windows of engagement are developed, the power of AV might have to be changed, but I don't think it would much.
If you can read this, it means you are reading.
Unless you are skimming
|
|
|
| |
|