|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5450
   |
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
How about HAVs lose 50% of their speed in general?
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5456
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
ads alt wrote:Atiim wrote:How about HAVs lose 50% of their speed in general? How about 30% and a nitros neef, and the gunlogi gets to be faster because balance?
If the Gunnlogi was made any faster, we'd shatter all balance and they would be broken beyond human comprehension.
How about we add light and heavy NOS Modules, and balance along those lines.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5456
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:ads alt wrote:Atiim wrote:How about HAVs lose 50% of their speed in general? How about 30% and a nitros neef, and the gunlogi gets to be faster because balance? 20% acceleration nerf, and 15% speed nerf. No to the nitro nerf. and Gunnlogi will never be faster than the Maddy ever again. It made no sense in the first place, and it won't now, nor will it ever.
What sense does it make for an Armored HAV to be faster than a Shielded HAV?
Less HP = More Speed.
Pretty simple concept to understand.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5456
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:Revert to 1.6 av
Tanks get 15% speed increase from 1.6
1.7 mods stay
Ability to accelerate with r2
Turn faster, accelerate slightly faster than 1.6
My main concern about reverting to 1.6 AV, is the fact that it will cause other vehicles to become underpowered.
For the one's saying "let's revert to 1.6 AV", please watch this video.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5460
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:
Actually, it's not simple at all. Do you understand how each of the races fight, right?
So then you agree that the 80GJ Blaster needs an incredible range nerf, right?
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5460
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release...
Not blowing around anymore hot air than tankers did once the AV nerf was announced 
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5461
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release... Not blowing around anymore hot air than tankers did once the AV nerf was announced The line you just wrote here basically says that "Tankers were huffing about how underpowered AV would be when the nerf patch notes were released." I don't think you read through what you wrote there...
This is why I can't stand when people use idioms.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5466
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 01:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Atiim wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Blowing hot air around guys?
Okay whatever, just remember that your complaints about reducing HAV speed won't be listened to because Webifiers are being designed to slow vehicles down in the future...
Cause, you know... if any of you actually took the time to read around instead of just flat-line complaining, you'd know of this tool, and would be promoting it's release... Not blowing around anymore hot air than tankers did once the AV nerf was announced The line you just wrote here basically says that "Tankers were huffing about how underpowered AV would be when the nerf patch notes were released." I don't think you read through what you wrote there... This is why I can't stand when people use idioms. So you're saying you don't want to be able to set webifier traps? Such a thing would allow tanks to be the prominent force in open areas, but in enclosed areas or nodes, the tanks would be highly vulnerable. This kind of situational power seems ideal to me.
I actually like the thought of webifires, and have suggested them myself.
What I can't stand, is when people use idioms such as "hit the books" or "piece of cake."
Not really sure why, but I'm not that great when it comes to idioms.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5470
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 02:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Twelve Guage wrote:How about having the damn things blow up like it used to be. It changed for a reason bluedot.
Yep. CCP heard Godin Thebad's tears and was quick to give him his bib and diaper.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5500
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 15:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
Benjamin Heisenberg wrote:Atiim wrote:How about HAVs lose 50% of their speed in general? real tanks are fast. They r also not easy to kill.. Quit bitching.
In real life AV usually OHKs every vehicle and existence, and/or kills the entire crew inside.
We had balance around real-life, but people like you wouldn't quit b!tching about it, so we had things your way.
Thanks for the advice, but nobody likes a hypocrite.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
|
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5521
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:
According to the Dev patch notes for vehicle changes the Cal tank is for hit and run and the changes were made according to that idea.
Actually it says nothing about caldari, rather it says shield. Caldari isn't made to be fast.
Shields also encompass the Gunnlogi.
Unless your willing to give the Gunnlogi as much shields as the Madrugar has armor, please stop referring to EVE Online.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5522
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Says the guy that couldn't kill tanks with swarms when they were OP.
Says the guy who can't survive AV now that HAVs are OP.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|