DUST Search - Finally the tank and rr QQ and defenders are done

Lynn Beck wrote:

Michael Arck wrote:

Auris Lionesse wrote:

now its going to be cr qq because crs were always the op rifle not rr

You sir are one of the very few on here who actually knows the truth. Can't tell the lemmings that tho.

sebastian the huds wrote:

I beg to differ, a bulky smg beating a full auto sniper rifle?

He's talking about Combat Rifles when compared to the "OP" Rail Rifles. Combat Rifles are lethal weapons. The common masses does not know this and have their eyes set on RR. It's a clusterfuck of shortsightedness that brought about the nerfing of RR.

I see CRs melt anybody at any given time, faster, than the RRs.

The combat rifle may have higher DPS, but it's still got drawbacks: low damage per clip- miss 3 bursts, you're not going to kill that Amarr Assault. I frequently even now finish a 1v1 with 6-12 bullets left.

The combat rifle still has around half the range.

The combat rifle still has the lowest damage in it's total ammo pool.

The rail rifle still hits hard, at range. The only thing it doesn't do in 1.8 is murder people at the same speed as an AR does within 0meters.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Michael Arck Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 3358	Posted - 2014.03.07 02:07:00 - [1] - Quote Auris Lionesse wrote: now its going to be cr qq because crs were always the op rifle not rr You sir are one of the very few on here who actually knows the truth. Can't tell the lemmings that tho. sebastian the huds wrote: I beg to differ, a bulky smg beating a full auto sniper rifle? He's talking about Combat Rifles when compared to the "OP" Rail Rifles. Combat Rifles are lethal weapons. The common masses does not know this and have their eyes set on RR. It's a clusterfuck of shortsightedness that brought about the nerfing of RR. I see CRs melt anybody at any given time, faster, than the RRs. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Are you OUKH?
Michael Arck Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Lokun Listamenn 3359	Posted - 2014.03.07 02:24:00 - [2] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: now its going to be cr qq because crs were always the op rifle not rr You sir are one of the very few on here who actually knows the truth. Can't tell the lemmings that tho. sebastian the huds wrote: I beg to differ, a bulky smg beating a full auto sniper rifle? He's talking about Combat Rifles when compared to the "OP" Rail Rifles. Combat Rifles are lethal weapons. The common masses does not know this and have their eyes set on RR. It's a clusterfuck of shortsightedness that brought about the nerfing of RR. I see CRs melt anybody at any given time, faster, than the RRs. The combat rifle may have higher DPS, but it's still got drawbacks: low damage per clip- miss 3 bursts, you're not going to kill that Amarr Assault. I frequently even now finish a 1v1 with 6-12 bullets left. The combat rifle still has around half the range. The combat rifle still has the lowest damage in it's total ammo pool. The rail rifle still hits hard, at range. The only thing it doesn't do in 1.8 is murder people at the same speed as an AR does within 0meters. Stats are okay to go by but honestly, when you look at the field results, CRs get the job done much better than the RR does. Of course if you look at the stat sheet, you will see that the RR is better. But in the field, in the right hands, the lethality of the CR is not expressed in its stat sheets. So I still stand by my statement. If you wanna talk about whats OP, then its is NOT RR, contrary to popular forum belief. It is the CR. Nothing against the CR but when people say the RR is OP, there's a seal somewhere facepalming in shame. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Are you OUKH?