|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
303
   |
Posted - 2014.03.05 18:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Scanning Table 1.8
Google Docs: LINK
HTML version: LINK
Column A describes 'Scanner Types', their background colour depends on their suit/type:
- Heavies have a light yellow background.
- Medium suits have a dark yellow background.
- Logistics suits have an orangey background.
- Scouts have a light purple background.
- Caldari Scouts have dark purple background.
- Active scanners have a red background.
- Active scanners with the Gallente Logistics bonus have a dark red background.
Column B describes the 'Scan Precision' of the scanners.
Column C-R describes, in pairs of columns, the number of, and type of, dampeners you need to fit on your suit to escape detection for the scanner listed in columns A-B and the 'Scan Profile' of your suit with those dampeners fitted.
The background colour for columns C-R is fixed to the number of, and type of, dampeners fitted, light colours for basic dampeners and dark colours for complex. The hue is changed to show that more slots are needed.
Caveats:
- There is (or used to be) a bug in which the order stacking penalties are (were) calculated, if you equipped a basic and a complex module it would put the stacking penalty on the complex module instead of the basic one. This bug is not taken into account in the table. So CCP if you are reading this please comment on wether it is still in the game or not. (So that I can update the table to take it into account if necessary.)
- The dampening bonus from cloaking devices are assumed to not incur stacking penalties on dampening modules, though there has been no word on wether or not they will, or will not, have stacking penalties. Again CCP if you could comment on this so that I can update the table to reflect how the game works.
- The table is based on the preview values for 1.8 and as such they could still be changed before 1.8 is released, if they do change I'll try to update the table as soon as possible.
Comparison 1.7 -> 1.8:
Commandos & Sentinels
- Scan Distance 10 -> 10
- Scan Profile 65 -> 60
- Scan Precision 60 -> 55
Assaults
- Scan Distance 10 -> 10
- Scan Profile 50 -> 50
- Scan Precision 55 -> 50
Logistics
- Scan Distance 10 -> 15
- Scan Profile 50 -> 50
- Scan Precision 50 -> 45
Scouts
- Scan Distance 16 -> 20
- Scan Profile 45 -> 35
- Scan Precision 45 -> 45
Apparently "Haerr" means "Hare"...
Shhh. Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm a hunted wabbit!
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
303
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 18:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Reserved.
Apparently "Haerr" means "Hare"...
Shhh. Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm a hunted wabbit!
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 18:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:Great Post!
You should post this to Nos Nothi....
I was just doing that! 
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
313
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 19:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
ratamaq doc wrote:Currently, either the reverse stacking penalty, or rounding up is present which means a medium frame needs 2c instead of 1c+1e to avoid 28db scanners. This has been confirmed numerous times. I hope it's fixed in 1.8.
You are right, I'm hoping it is fixed in 1.8 too.
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
318
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 21:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Feedback thread regarding scanning in 1.8: LINK
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
344
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 13:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Updated the OP with the new change. (Scouts Scan Precision 45->40)
Added a table where cloakig devices count towards the stacking penalty of profile dampeners.
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
358
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 18:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:I'm thinking that the stacking penalty error for negative modifiers will probably still apply in 1.8. I'm also thinking that stacking penalties will apply for the cloak, but even if it doesn't, cloak + 1 complex will still have the same dB value of 18 either way, since it's rounded to the nearest whole number.
Hopefully I will be proven wrong on both counts :)
I hope so too! :)
Justicar Karnellia wrote:Great work. thanks.
Thank you! 
Vrain Matari wrote:Kaughst wrote:I find the reduction on scan precision with the medium suits welcoming. And the changes to Logi scan range are interesting. Suit choices are becoming richer, more nuanced.
More nuances to the scanning system is nice, hopefully they'll add more E-WAR soon.
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
358
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 18:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:Thanks for my 1000th like! Likes all around for everyone :)
Nailed it! 
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
414
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 08:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Just wondering if anyone has found any inconsistencies in the table.
Scanning Table for 1.8: LINK
|
Haerr
Legio DXIV
610
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 09:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
bump in the name of lorry!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|