|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
1943
   |
Posted - 2014.03.05 01:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:The Gallante should (at level V) have 25% bonus HP from Ferroscale and Reactive plates
The Amarr should have 25% more HP from regular plates
Then the Amarr would be better armor tankers while the Gallante would be better CQC brawlers, since they wouldn't be hampered by heavy plates anymore.
I think it would work. Though the Minmatar would need 35% faster Shield recharge (7% per level) and the Caldari would need 25% more HP from Shield modules.
This should be an bonus to all Gallante suits not just assaults.
For the Federation!
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
1948
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 03:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would love to be able to run Full reactives on my Gallente but even if that fit was viable now it will be outclassed in 1.8 when Caldari's can passively rep 40 HP/s :O
I think that armor will be UP again when people realize that passively repairing shields is so much more useful than armor repairing, specially when NOBODY USES ARMOR REPAIR TOOLS, and triage hives are nerfed to crap.
For the Federation!
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
1949
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 03:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:I would love to be able to run Full reactives on my Gallente but even if that fit was viable now it will be outclassed in 1.8 when Caldari's can passively rep 40 HP/s :O you forget-shields have a recharge delay, armor does not. I did some math in another thread (i would not like to reproduce it) that shows that 2x complex reppers, 1x enhanced plate and 1x proto plate on a gallente assault has better regen, hp, and damage than a min assault with a kin cat and 4x extenders
Min assault has crappy shield repair, it is obvious it needs a buff therefore it isn't a fair comparison. IMO the shield repair from the Caldari and Minmatar should be switched...
For the Federation!
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens
League of Infamy
1950
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 03:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:BL4CKST4R wrote:I would love to be able to run Full reactives on my Gallente but even if that fit was viable now it will be outclassed in 1.8 when Caldari's can passively rep 40 HP/s :O you forget-shields have a recharge delay, armor does not. I did some math in another thread (i would not like to reproduce it) that shows that 2x complex reppers, 1x enhanced plate and 1x proto plate on a gallente assault has better regen, hp, and damage than a min assault with a kin cat and 4x extenders Min assault has crappy shield repair, it is obvious it needs a buff therefore it isn't a fair comparison. IMO the shield repair from the Caldari and Minmatar should be switched... Hey, a sensible post! These things are like double rainbows sprouting from a unicorn horn In all honesty though, you can recover 90% of your total armor in 30 seconds with the fit i just mentioned, which seems about right, but just goes to show that shields need better regeneration
Depends on the build and the suit, but I got this with 1.8 stats with the same modules you chose.
Gallente
2x 5 ARepair
2 ARepair
110 AHP
135 AHP
210 AHP
120 SHP
Gallente has
12 aHP repair
455 aHP
120 sHP
575 THP
7.74 Speed penalty
37.6 Seconds to full HP
Time to kill at 388 DPS 1.48s
Caldari
4x 66 SHP
210 SHP
120 AHP
40 SRepair
474 SHP
120 AHP
594 THP
(assuming 4/6 using 6) 23.05 seconds to full HP (ignoring armor repair)
Time to kill at 400 DPS 1.485 seconds
In a non dual tanked, non damage buffed scenario the Caldari has the advantage over a repair/armor tanked Gallente suit, both in Total HP (3.1%), Time to Kill (0.04%) and Faster repair (38.6%).
For the Federation!
|
|
|
| |
|