|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1824
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 01:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
sounds like you're just making ways to annoy pilots. No. Also, every vehicle has a weakpoint.
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1824
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 01:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Komodo Jones wrote:Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:vehicles already have weak points 30% more damage for attacking the rear 50% for hiting the underside. (this is the best way to kill tanks sitting on ledges that are dipping down) I mean weak points that are more easily accessible, and they must've removed them because I hit vehicles from behind all the time and all it does is the standard damage, even when I heard about hitting tanks from behind and dealing massive damage during matches I thought it was bullshit
You're missing. That's like complaining that you can' get headshots.
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1824
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 01:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Komodo Jones wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Komodo Jones wrote:Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:vehicles already have weak points 30% more damage for attacking the rear 50% for hiting the underside. (this is the best way to kill tanks sitting on ledges that are dipping down) I mean weak points that are more easily accessible, and they must've removed them because I hit vehicles from behind all the time and all it does is the standard damage, even when I heard about hitting tanks from behind and dealing massive damage during matches I thought it was bullshit You're missing. That's like complaining that you can' get headshots. Missing the backside of a tank? Getting a headshot is not the same as hitting something the size of a car.
Considering the spots on the back of a HAV is the size of a heavy's head's hitbox, yes it is.
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1830
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 20:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Komodo Jones wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote: Considering the spots on the back of a HAV is the size of a heavy's head's hitbox, yes it is.
That's not a weak point, that's no better than a coding glitch. If this is what players have to rely on to deal more damage or to even out the playing field for infantry vs. vehicle combat then it's nothing but a joke and a good reason for why this post exists in the first place, CCP has to have better ideas than what's essentially an exhaust vent leading to the core of the death star, the force isn't strong with everyone.
Like I said, that's like complaining that you're not getting headshots.
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1830
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 21:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote:On a Gal tank you can aim for those glowing circles on the sides (took out a madruger with just 2 REs this way). Cal tanks have a small fuel tank on the back, this is your target.
1: Those are taillights, and that's not where it is
2: That's a reactor
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
|
|
|