|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
501
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 21:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
I love how this has happened. How the strongest eve alliance or coalition how ever you want to put it suck at this game. They say when pc2.0 comes out we shall fear the almighty never-mind i can't even make a sarcastic joke about top men.
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
501
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 21:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote:I love how this has happened. How the strongest eve alliance or coalition how ever you want to put it suck at this game. They say when pc2.0 comes out we shall fear the almighty never-mind i can't even make a sarcastic joke about top men. Who says that? I thought we said that Dust is such a terrible, no content game that fails to live up to even the most basic promises set forth by CCP when it was announced that we can't be bothered to put any effort into it. We're actually telling people not to play the game, because we want our player base to be introduced to it once it's not so terrible instead of getting burned out permanently because of how bad it is.
Killer-12 he said that cfc could destroy any dust/eve alliance eve side( which is true). They are waiting till pc2.0 to attack. I'll find the quote 1 sec.
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
501
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 21:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
It was not killer-12. My mistake but it was a person from Top men. Nomed Deeps
Nomed Deeps wrote:Quote:Nomed picked apart most of your post, he missed this one. "True DUST/EVE alliance" I skipped commenting on that because everyone knows there is barely any EVE/DUST integration currently. Give a real reason for an EVE presence with DUST and you'll see one. Until then, you'll mostly see DUSTers playing pilots.
Nomed Deeps wrote:Quote:The corporate raiders seem to be a corp stuck in a canyon. They are stuck between success and failure. Due to one of their directors they are know by big name corps, but they are not strong. PC is currently in a state where it is pointless to take PC seriously (which had already been stated). So to try and judge which corp is strong or weak off of current PC performance is also pointless. .
Truly the argument stated here is ignorance. The idea of not entering pc because it is pointless seems lazy.
It would make sense to say " We tried in pc and lost. After multiple defeats we stopped because it was hurting our moral too much "
Saying pc is pointless is like " I don't want to go to school because i would fail and the teachers hate me. The education system is broken "
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.04 03:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
Moronic Farce wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote: Truly the argument stated here is ignorance. The idea of not entering pc because it is pointless seems lazy.
It would make sense to say " We tried in pc and lost. After multiple defeats we stopped because it was hurting our moral too much "
Saying pc is pointless is like " I don't want to go to school because i would fail and the teachers hate me. The education system is broken "
I know everyone wants to cling to the narrative that goons are incompetent morons who you would totally show who's the boss if only they would play by the rules you've made up but we actually did alright in PC until burnout killed our interest in it. We are a small corp who doesn't recruit among the player base because we want people who are fun to play with rather than people with "gun game" so we just don't have the numbers to cycle people through PC matches.
That is understandable.
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
534
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 21:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
lionshead nebula wrote:SPESHULz wrote:You have never won a single battle where you have been on the enemy team from me. Let's think this statement over. At of all the games in which you might be against one person with a goonfeet tag, including pubs (which is randomized team comp. btw) you think you can extrapolate performance from a small selection of data? On to PC, given your corp history and this characters birthdate, frankly I'm not surprised you didn't face goons in PC, and frankly you shouldn't be riding the coattails of others because your corp held a district that primarily involved other people's effort, instead of yours. So looking at your statement would suggest you're overcompensating or you're just that delusional to believe that your statement changes the fabric of the past as well as your perception of the past is all encompassing.
How pc battles has Goonfeet been in?
1.8 must be a porn star because it is taking a long time to come.
|
|
|
|