DUST Search - A great video by a great human has been detected

Takahiro Kashuken wrote:

Not even past the 1st graph and hes already ignoring ROF

I can see this is going to biased as ****

EDIT: Cant use swarms against a shield ADS with a hardener, wont do anything - bad example

Why is he going over stacking penalties? these are already in the game, plus thats only if they put on all the hardeners they have

Proto swarm fires each missile on its own, because each missile hit the vehicle on its own if it cannot break the regen the damage will be repped back

Ignores ROF again

So comparing militia swarms with a top modded python - Not swarms do reduced damage to shields also each missile hits on its own, it may fire 4 missiles but they hit 1 after each other and not even as a group, they will not break the regen with 1 hardener on

So now your trying to balance proto FG to a mlt HAV? if we have proto hulls we could balance it with proto AV but also increasing the proto breach would end any and all DS in the sky

lolbalance, rich coming from the guy who wants to remove railguns from the game

1. Cap has already been requested by quite a few ppl including me back in the close beta - copy and paste from EVE job done

2. Have it if you want but infantry will cry if a protobear gets 3 of them and is unkillable

3. We already have mod stacking penalties, if i use 2 i get more resistance but not full resistance

4. You mean like the afterburner for ariel vehicles and nitro for ground vehicles?

5. We can still do that since meta level 1-3 is mlt/basic, 4-6 is adv, 7-9 is proto and 10+ is officer, problem is infantry dont want vehicles to have adv/proto hulls so you cant balance adv/proto AV because if you let proto AV 1 shot basic then we are back to pre 1.7

I wasted my time watching that

Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 6979	Posted - 2014.03.01 19:41:00 - [1] - Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lBjUlQNYR4&list=UUy11xToip47aIW0M9TSOKrQ&feature=c4-overview I enjoyed watching this very much. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 6984	Posted - 2014.03.01 20:58:00 - [2] - Quote COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: CCP needs to hire people like Judge to do the balancing. It's vids like this that make me wonder what the hell they're thinking when they crunch numbers. Assuming they crunch numbers. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 6991	Posted - 2014.03.01 21:51:00 - [3] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Assuming they crunch numbers. It has been 87 days since 1.7... We have no devblogs about 1.8 and the feedback threads they opened haven't been updated. Community interaction is the foundation of an MMO and they are failing miserably at it. What the **** makes you think they are capable of crunching numbers? Actually, they aren't talking for a reason. It's supposed to be the last time we have bad communication. It's something about CCP Rouge restructuring stuff. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 6994	Posted - 2014.03.01 22:14:00 - [4] - Quote sabre prime wrote: Nice video. I liked the graphs. What did we learn? This game will never be balanced. No, we learned to think more carefully about how changes will affect other aspects of the game. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries General Tso's Alliance 7032	Posted - 2014.03.02 19:40:00 - [5] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Not even past the 1st graph and hes already ignoring ROF I can see this is going to biased as **** EDIT: Cant use swarms against a shield ADS with a hardener, wont do anything - bad example Why is he going over stacking penalties? these are already in the game, plus thats only if they put on all the hardeners they have Proto swarm fires each missile on its own, because each missile hit the vehicle on its own if it cannot break the regen the damage will be repped back Ignores ROF again So comparing militia swarms with a top modded python - Not swarms do reduced damage to shields also each missile hits on its own, it may fire 4 missiles but they hit 1 after each other and not even as a group, they will not break the regen with 1 hardener on So now your trying to balance proto FG to a mlt HAV? if we have proto hulls we could balance it with proto AV but also increasing the proto breach would end any and all DS in the sky lolbalance, rich coming from the guy who wants to remove railguns from the game 1. Cap has already been requested by quite a few ppl including me back in the close beta - copy and paste from EVE job done 2. Have it if you want but infantry will cry if a protobear gets 3 of them and is unkillable 3. We already have mod stacking penalties, if i use 2 i get more resistance but not full resistance 4. You mean like the afterburner for ariel vehicles and nitro for ground vehicles? 5. We can still do that since meta level 1-3 is mlt/basic, 4-6 is adv, 7-9 is proto and 10+ is officer, problem is infantry dont want vehicles to have adv/proto hulls so you cant balance adv/proto AV because if you let proto AV 1 shot basic then we are back to pre 1.7 I wasted my time watching that I already asked about that. He said this was just an example of how imbalances can easily be created by balancing other aspects of the game. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos